ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Affective video recommender systems: A survey.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An overview of video recommender systems: state-of-the-art and research issues.Frontiers in big data · 2023Review
- Integrating audio and visual modalities for multimodal personality trait recognitionFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional video recommendation provides the viewers with customized media content according to their historical records (e.g., ratings, reviews). However, such systems tend to generate terrible results if the data is insufficient, which leads to a cold-start problem. An affective video recommender system (AVRS) is a multidiscipline and multimodal human-robot interaction (HRI) system, and it incorporates physical, physiological, neuroscience, and computer science subjects and multimedia resources, including text, audio, and video. As a promising research domain, AVRS employs advanced affective analysis technologies in video resources; therefore, it can solve the cold-start problem. In AVRS, the viewers' emotional responses can be obtained from various techniques, including physical signals (e.g., facial expression, gestures, and speech) and internal signals (e.g., physiological signals). The changes in these signals can be detected when the viewers face specific situations. The physiological signals are a response to central and autonomic nervous systems and are mostly involuntarily activated, which cannot be easily controlled. Therefore, it is suitable for reliable emotion analysis. The physical signals can be recorded by a webcam or recorder. In contrast, the physiological signals can be collected by various equipment, e.g., psychophysiological heart rate (HR) signals calculated by echocardiogram (ECG), electro-dermal activity (EDA), and brain activity (GA) from electroencephalography (EEG) signals, skin conductance response (SCR) by a galvanic skin response (GSR), and photoplethysmography (PPG) estimating users' pulse. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the AVRS domain. To analyze the recent efforts in the field of affective video recommendation, we collected 92 relevant published articles from Google Scholar and summarized the articles and their key findings. In this survey, we feature these articles concerning AVRS from different perspectives, including various traditional recommendation algorithms and advanced deep learning-based algorithms, the commonly used affective video recommendation databases, audience response categories, and evaluation methods. Finally, we conclude the challenge of AVRS and provide the potential future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.