Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36090266›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Factors affecting two-point discrimination in Argus II patients.

Ezgi I Yücel, Roksana Sadeghi, Arathy Kartha, Sandra Rocio Montezuma, Gislin Dagnelie, Ariel Rokem, Geoffrey M Boynton, Ione Fine, Michael Beyeler

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05285618 (Predicting the Perceptual Experience of Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Users), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05285618 nacompletednot on this map

Predicting the Perceptual Experience of Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Users

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraRan2022 to 2023Enrolled6ConditionsRetinitis PigmentosaArmsArgus II
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Efficient Spatial Estimation of Perceptual Thresholds for Retinal Implants via Gaussian Process Regression.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  6. Aligning Visual Prosthetic Development With Implantee Needs.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  7. Aligning visual prosthetic development with implantee needs.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ezgi I YücelDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Roksana SadeghiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Arathy KarthaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sandra Rocio MontezumaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Gislin DagnelieDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Ariel RokemDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Geoffrey M BoyntonDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Ione FineDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Michael BeyelerDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States.

Funding

LENS MEMBRANE IN RELATION TO HUMAN CATARACTOGENESISR01EY002932 · NEI · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TAKEMOTO, LARRY J · 1985 to 2010
$3.3M
Learning to see again: biological constraints on cortical plasticity and the implications for sight restoration technologiesR01EY031312 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOYNTON, GEOFFREY M, FINE, IONE · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002932NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two of the main obstacles to the development of epiretinal prosthesis technology are electrodes that require current amplitudes above safety limits to reliably elicit percepts, and a failure to consistently elicit pattern vision. Here, we explored the causes of high current amplitude thresholds and poor spatial resolution within the Argus II epiretinal implant. We measured current amplitude thresholds and two-point discrimination (the ability to determine whether one or two electrodes had been stimulated) in 3 blind participants implanted with Argus II devices. Our data and simulations show that axonal stimulation, lift and retinal damage all play a role in reducing performance in the Argus 2, by either limiting sensitivity and/or reducing spatial resolution. Understanding the relative role of these various factors will be critical for developing and surgically implanting devices that can successfully subserve pattern vision.

Indexed as

current spreadmodelingpsychophysicsretinaretinal prosthesissight restoration

Identifiers

PMID36090266
PMCPMC9448992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.