Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36090140›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2022

Disturbance cue communication is shaped by emitter diet and receiver background risk in Trinidadian guppies.

Jack A Goldman, Adam L Crane, Laurence E A Feyten, Emily Collins, Grant E Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jack A GoldmanDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, Canada H4B 1R6.
Adam L CraneDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, Canada H4B 1R6.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8645-8180
Laurence E A FeytenDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, Canada H4B 1R6.
Emily CollinsDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, Canada H4B 1R6.
Grant E BrownDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC, Canada H4B 1R6.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3493-3477

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In animal communication systems, individuals that detect a cue (i.e., "receivers") are often influenced by characteristics of the cue emitter. For instance, in many species, receivers avoid chemical cues that are released by emitters experiencing disturbance. These chemical "disturbance cues" appear to benefit receivers by warning them about nearby danger, such as a predator's approach. While the active ingredients in disturbance cues have been largely unexplored, by-products of metabolized protein are thought to play a role for some species. If so, the content (quality) and volume (quantity) of the emitter's diet should affect their disturbance cues, thus altering how receivers perceive the cues and respond. Guppies

Indexed as

alarm cueschemical cuesdiet qualitydiet quantityprotein

Identifiers

PMID36090140
PMCPMC9450174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.