Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36089968›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental and public health2022

Sentiment Grading and Evaluation of Network Resources of Ideological and Political Education in Colleges and Universities: A Research Based on Artificial Intelligence.

Junling Jia

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Junling JiaSchool of Physical Education and Health Education, Taizhou College, Nanjing Normal University, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6806-6186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current new round of scientific and technological revolution represented by artificial intelligence is rapidly driving a new wave of development of the times, and the rapid iterative update of science and technology is triggering new changes in educational concepts and educational thinking methods. Only by deeply understanding the reshaping of education concept, teaching concept, and learning concept by the new generation of scientific and technological revolution, as well as the major opportunities and challenges brought to education, can we understand the future direction of the development of ideological and political education for college students. This study takes the ideological and political education and teaching of college students as the research object. It begins by defining artificial intelligence and the ideological and political education of college students and analyzes the new concepts of precise individualization, intelligent teaching, and evaluation brought by artificial intelligence to the ideological and political education of college students. Then, it selects the students who have studied ideological and political education network resources as the empirical objects, designs a questionnaire based on the emotional characteristics of the resources, implements a questionnaire survey, uses the Stata software to conduct a correlation analysis on the acceptance of the students, and finally verifies the resources. Combined with empirical results, this article analyzes the influence of emotional characteristics of resources on students' acceptance, reveals the carrier role of ideological and political network resources in school emotional education and students through mirror theory and student response theory, respectively, and establishes the principle of graded reading guidance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitudeEducational StatusHumansStudentsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID36089968
PMCPMC9458389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.