ArticleThe American journal of case reports2022
A 32-Year-Old Man with Persistent Olfactory Dysfunction Following COVID-19 Whose Recovery Was Evaluated by Retronasal Olfactory Testing.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anosmia, which is loss of smell, is a recognized complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which may persist after recovery from infection. Retronasal olfactory testing includes both subjective questionnaires and physiological tests that can be used to evaluate recovery of smell. This report presents the case of a 32-year-old man with persistent loss of smell following COVID-19 whose recovery was evaluated by retronasal olfactory testing. CASE REPORT The patient was a 32-year-old man with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. He was aware of his olfactory dysfunction. Using the orthonasal test, a T&T Olfactometer 2 months after disease onset showed an olfactory threshold score of 2.2 points (mild decrease) and olfactory identification result of 3.4 points (moderate decrease). However, the retronasal intravenous olfactory test showed no response, indicating severe olfactory dysfunction. After 3 months of olfactory training and therapy with steroidal nasal drops (Fluticasone Furoate, 27.5 µg/day) and oral vitamins (Mecobalamin, 1500 µg/day), the patient's orthonasal test olfactory threshold score improved to 0.6 points (normal), and his olfactory identification result improved to 1.2 points (mild decrease). Although the retronasal intravenous olfactory test showed a weak response, a reaction did occur. At this time, the patient did not report any improvement in his symptoms. CONCLUSIONS This report has shown that in cases of persistent anosmia following COVID-19, retronasal olfactory testing can be used to evaluate recovery of the sense of smell.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.