Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36089610›Full record

ReviewCell & bioscience2022

Three-dimensional in vitro culture models in oncology research.

Camille Jubelin, Javier Muñoz-Garcia, Laurent Griscom, Denis Cochonneau, Emilie Ollivier, Marie-Françoise Heymann, François M Vallette, Lisa Oliver, Dominique Heymann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell & bioscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Oncogenic Role of SRPK2 in Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Biomimetic Scaffold-Based 3D Models for Decoding Cancer Biology and Advancing Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camille Jubelin *Nantes Université, CNRS, US2B, UMR 6286, 44000, Nantes, France.
Javier Muñoz-Garcia *Nantes Université, CNRS, US2B, UMR 6286, 44000, Nantes, France.
Laurent GriscomUniv Rennes, CNRS, INSERM, Biosit UAR 3480 US_S 018, BIM3D core facility, Rennes, France.
Denis CochonneauInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Tumor Heterogeneity and Precision Medicine Lab.. Université de Nantes, 44805, Saint-Herblain, France.
Emilie OllivierInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Tumor Heterogeneity and Precision Medicine Lab.. Université de Nantes, 44805, Saint-Herblain, France.
Marie-Françoise HeymannInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Tumor Heterogeneity and Precision Medicine Lab.. Université de Nantes, 44805, Saint-Herblain, France.
François M ValletteNantes Université, INSERM, CRCINA, UMR1232, Nantes, France.
Lisa OliverNantes Université, INSERM, CRCINA, UMR1232, Nantes, France.
Dominique HeymannNantes Université, CNRS, US2B, UMR 6286, 44000, Nantes, France. dominique.heymann@univ-nantes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-0669

Funding

ICO Internal funding DORSARC2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a multifactorial disease that is responsible for 10 million deaths per year. The intra- and inter-heterogeneity of malignant tumors make it difficult to develop single targeted approaches. Similarly, their diversity requires various models to investigate the mechanisms involved in cancer initiation, progression, drug resistance and recurrence. Of the in vitro cell-based models, monolayer adherent (also known as 2D culture) cell cultures have been used for the longest time. However, it appears that they are often less appropriate than the three-dimensional (3D) cell culture approach for mimicking the biological behavior of tumor cells, in particular the mechanisms leading to therapeutic escape and drug resistance. Multicellular tumor spheroids are widely used to study cancers in 3D, and can be generated by a multiplicity of techniques, such as liquid-based and scaffold-based 3D cultures, microfluidics and bioprinting. Organoids are more complex 3D models than multicellular tumor spheroids because they are generated from stem cells isolated from patients and are considered as powerful tools to reproduce the disease development in vitro. The present review provides an overview of the various 3D culture models that have been set up to study cancer development and drug response. The advantages of 3D models compared to 2D cell cultures, the limitations, and the fields of application of these models and their techniques of production are also discussed.

Indexed as

3D cell cultureBioprintingCancerLiquid-based 3D cultureMicrofluidicsMulticellular tumor spheroidOrganoidScaffold-based 3D culture

Identifiers

PMID36089610
PMCPMC9465969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.