ArticleClinical epigenetics2022
Comprehensive comparison between azacytidine and decitabine treatment in an acute myeloid leukemia cell line.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increasing TET Expression and 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Formation by a Carbocyclic 5-Aza-2'-deoxy-cytidine Antimetabolite.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Synthetic lethality of decitabine plus ATR inhibition for TP53-mutated AML.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Efficacy of azacitidine in meningiomas and explorative analyses of underlying molecular mechanisms.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Integrated analysis of post-transcriptional regulations reveals insights into acute myeloid leukemia.Communications biology · 2025Article
- DNA-encoded library screening uncovers potent DNMT2 inhibitors targeting a cryptic allosteric binding site.iScience · 2025Article
- Disrupting the epigenetic alliance: structural insights and therapeutic strategies targeting DNMT1-UHRF1.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Exposing the DNA methylation-responsive compartment of the leukaemic genome in T-ALL cell lines support its potential as a novel therapeutic target in T-ALL.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- NAIL-MS reveals tRNA and rRNA hypomodification as a consequence of 5-fluorouracil treatment.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Review
- The type of DNA damage response after decitabine treatment depends on the level of DNMT activity.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Extended exposure to low doses of azacitidine induces differentiation of leukemic stem cells through activation of myeloperoxidase.Haematologica · 2024Article
- HDAC-driven mechanisms in anticancer resistance: epigenetics and beyond.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2024Review
- Upregulation of RSPO3 via targeted promoter DNA demethylation inhibits the progression of cholangiocarcinoma.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Azacytidine (AzaC) and decitabine (AzadC) are cytosine analogs that covalently trap DNA methyltransferases, which place the important epigenetic mark 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine by methylating 2'-deoxycytidine (dC) at the C5 position. AzaC and AzadC are used in the clinic as antimetabolites to treat myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia and are explored against other types of cancer. Although their principal mechanism of action is known, the downstream effects of AzaC and AzadC treatment are not well understood and the cellular prerequisites that determine sensitivity toward AzaC and AzadC remain elusive. Here, we investigated the effects and phenotype of AzaC and AzadC exposure on the acute myeloid leukemia cell line MOLM-13. We found that while AzaC and AzadC share many effects on the cellular level, including decreased global DNA methylation, increased formation of DNA double-strand breaks, transcriptional downregulation of important oncogenes and similar changes on the proteome level, AzaC failed in contrast to AzadC to induce apoptosis efficiently in MOLM-13. The only cellular marker that correlated with this clear phenotypical outcome was the level of hydroxy-methyl-dC, an additional epigenetic mark that is placed by TET enzymes and repressed in cancer cells. Whereas AzadC increased hmdC substantially in MOLM-13, AzaC treatment did not result in any increase at all. This suggests that hmdC levels in cancer cells should be monitored as a response toward AzaC and AzadC and considered as a biomarker to judge whether AzaC or AzadC treatment leads to cell death in leukemic cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.