Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36089606›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2022

Comprehensive comparison between azacytidine and decitabine treatment in an acute myeloid leukemia cell line.

Tina Aumer, Constanze B Gremmelmaier, Leander S Runtsch, Johannes C Pforr, G Nur Yeşiltaç, Stefanie Kaiser, Franziska R Traube

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HDAC-driven mechanisms in anticancer resistance: epigenetics and beyond.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tina Aumer *Department of Chemistry, Institute for Chemical Epigenetics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Würmtalstr. 201, 81375, Munich, Germany.
Constanze B Gremmelmaier *Faculty of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Leander S Runtsch *Department of Chemistry, Institute for Chemical Epigenetics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Würmtalstr. 201, 81375, Munich, Germany.
Johannes C PforrFaculty of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748, Garching, Germany.
G Nur YeşiltaçInstitut Für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Max-von-Laue-Straße 9, 60438, Frankfurt, Germany.
Stefanie KaiserInstitut Für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main, Max-von-Laue-Straße 9, 60438, Frankfurt, Germany.
Franziska R TraubeDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Chemical Epigenetics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Würmtalstr. 201, 81375, Munich, Germany. franziska.traube@lmu.de.
Technical University of Munich · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Azacytidine (AzaC) and decitabine (AzadC) are cytosine analogs that covalently trap DNA methyltransferases, which place the important epigenetic mark 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine by methylating 2'-deoxycytidine (dC) at the C5 position. AzaC and AzadC are used in the clinic as antimetabolites to treat myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia and are explored against other types of cancer. Although their principal mechanism of action is known, the downstream effects of AzaC and AzadC treatment are not well understood and the cellular prerequisites that determine sensitivity toward AzaC and AzadC remain elusive. Here, we investigated the effects and phenotype of AzaC and AzadC exposure on the acute myeloid leukemia cell line MOLM-13. We found that while AzaC and AzadC share many effects on the cellular level, including decreased global DNA methylation, increased formation of DNA double-strand breaks, transcriptional downregulation of important oncogenes and similar changes on the proteome level, AzaC failed in contrast to AzadC to induce apoptosis efficiently in MOLM-13. The only cellular marker that correlated with this clear phenotypical outcome was the level of hydroxy-methyl-dC, an additional epigenetic mark that is placed by TET enzymes and repressed in cancer cells. Whereas AzadC increased hmdC substantially in MOLM-13, AzaC treatment did not result in any increase at all. This suggests that hmdC levels in cancer cells should be monitored as a response toward AzaC and AzadC and considered as a biomarker to judge whether AzaC or AzadC treatment leads to cell death in leukemic cells.

Indexed as

AzacitidineLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteCell LineDecitabineDNADNA MethylationHumansAzacitidineDecitabineDNA5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine5-aza-cytidineCancer epigenomeDNA hypomethylating agentsEpigenetic drugs

Identifiers

PMID36089606
PMCPMC9465881
OpenAlexW4295194215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.