Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36089134›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2022

APOBEC mutagenesis, kataegis, chromothripsis in EGFR-mutant osimertinib-resistant lung adenocarcinomas.

P Selenica, A Marra, N J Choudhury, A Gazzo, C J Falcon, J Patel, X Pei, Y Zhu, C K Y Ng, M Curry and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Genetic feature diversity ofGenes & diseases · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P SelenicaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
A MarraMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
N J ChoudhuryDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
A GazzoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
C J FalconDruckenmiller Center for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA.
J PatelMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
X PeiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
Y ZhuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
C K Y NgDepartment for BioMedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
M CurryDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
G HellerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
Y-K ZhangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville.
M F BergerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Department of Pathology, Molecular Diagnostics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
M LadanyiDepartment of Pathology, Molecular Diagnostics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City.
C M RudinDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, USA.
S ChandarlapatyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, USA.
C M LovlyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville.
J S Reis-FilhoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City. Electronic address: reisfilj@mskcc.org.
H A YuDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, USA. Electronic address: yuh@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The Role of Focal Oncogene Amplifications in Lung CancerP01CA129243 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Piro Lito · 2007 to 2026
$31.2M
Targeting Polθ to Overcome PARP Inhibitor Resistance in Homologous Recombination Deficient Breast CancerP50CA247749 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Sarat Chandarlapaty, Simon N. Powell · 2020 to 2026
$16.3M
ECOG-ACRIN Thoracic Malignancies Integrated Translational Science CenterUG1CA233259 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CARBONE, DAVID P., LEAL, TICIANA · 2019 to 2025
$5.1M
HER2-mediated delivery of cytotoxic agents in solid tumorsR01CA249666 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHANDARLAPATY, SARAT · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
Drivers of histologic transformation in EGFR-mutant lung cancerR01CA264078 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI RUDIN, CHARLES M., YU, HELENA · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
Mechanistic insights into Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) using novel EGFR variants as a paradigmR01CA227833 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LOVLY, CHRISTINE M., MEILER, JENS · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
Implications and Vulnerabilities of APOBEC Mutagenesis in Breast CancerR01CA244812 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHANDARLAPATY, SARAT, HARRIS, REUBEN S · 2020 to 2020
$722k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA129243NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA247749NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227833NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244812NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249666NCI NIH HHS R01 CA264078NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies of targeted therapy resistance in lung cancer have primarily focused on single-gene alterations. Based on prior work implicating apolipoprotein b mRNA-editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) mutagenesis in histological transformation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers, we hypothesized that mutational signature analysis may help elucidate acquired resistance to targeted therapies. PATIENTS AND

methodsAPOBEC mutational signatures derived from an Food and Drug Administration-cleared multigene panel [Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT)] using the Signature Multivariate Analysis (SigMA) algorithm were validated against the gold standard of mutational signatures derived from whole-exome sequencing. Mutational signatures were decomposed in 3276 unique lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), including 93 paired osimertinib-naïve and -resistant EGFR-mutant tumors. Associations between APOBEC and mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib were investigated. Whole-genome sequencing was carried out on available EGFR-mutant lung cancer samples (10 paired, 17 unpaired) to investigate large-scale genomic alterations potentially contributing to osimertinib resistance.

resultsAPOBEC mutational signatures were more frequent in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-driven lung cancers (EGFR, ALK, RET, and ROS1; 25%) compared to LUADs at large (20%, P < 0.001); across all subtypes, APOBEC mutational signatures were enriched in subclonal mutations (P < 0.001). In EGFR-mutant lung cancers, osimertinib-resistant samples more frequently displayed an APOBEC-dominant mutational signature compared to osimertinib-naïve samples (28% versus 14%, P = 0.03). Specifically, mutations detected in osimertinib-resistant tumors but not in pre-treatment samples significantly more frequently displayed an APOBEC-dominant mutational signature (44% versus 23%, P < 0.001). EGFR-mutant samples with APOBEC-dominant signatures had enrichment of large-scale genomic rearrangements (P = 0.01) and kataegis (P = 0.03) in areas of APOBEC mutagenesis.

conclusionsAPOBEC mutational signatures are frequent in RTK-driven LUADs and increase under the selective pressure of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. APOBEC mutational signature enrichment in subclonal mutations, private mutations acquired after osimertinib treatment, and areas of large-scale genomic rearrangements highlights a potentially fundamental role for APOBEC mutagenesis in the development of resistance to targeted therapies, which may be potentially exploited to overcome such resistance.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungChromothripsisLung NeoplasmsAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsHumansIndolesMutagenesisMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsPyrimidinesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIndolesosimertinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsPyrimidinesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinasesacquired resistanceAPOBECEGFRmutational signaturesosimertinib

Identifiers

PMID36089134
PMCPMC10360454
OpenAlexW4295141458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.