Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36088755›Full record

SynthesisSleep medicine reviews2022

Sleep and affect: A conceptual review.

Maia Ten Brink, Jessica R Dietch, Joshua Tutek, Sooyeon A Suh, James J Gross, Rachel Manber

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sleep medicine reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Daily, prospective associations between sleep architecture and affect: insights from Bayesian multilevel compositional data analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Moving toward affective immunology: Legacy and future directions.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maia Ten BrinkDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: mtb@stanford.edu.
Jessica R DietchSchool of Psychological Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Joshua TutekDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sooyeon A SuhDepartment of Psychology, Sungshin University, Seoul, South Korea.
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Rachel ManberDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USOregon State University · USStanford Medicine · USSungshin Women's University · KR

Funding

Supplement to sleep health intervention for shift workersK23HL157698 · NHLBI · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica R Dietch · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL157698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday experience suggests that sleep and affect are closely linked, with daytime affect influencing how we sleep, and sleep influencing subsequent affect. Yet empirical evidence for this bidirectional relationship between sleep and affect in non-clinical adult samples remains mixed, which may be due to heterogeneity in both construct definitions and measurement. This conceptual review proposes a granular framework that deconstructs sleep and affect findings according to three subordinate dimensions, namely domains (which are distinct for sleep and affect), methods (i.e., self-report vs. behavioral/physiological measures), and timescale (i.e., shorter vs. longer). We illustrate the value of our granular framework through a systematic review of empirical studies published in PubMed (N = 80 articles). We found that in some cases, particularly for sleep disturbances and sleep duration, our framework identified robust evidence for associations with affect that are separable by domain, method, and timescale. However, in most other cases, evidence was either inconclusive or too sparse, resulting in no clear patterns. Our review did not find support for granular bidirectionality between sleep and affect. We suggest a roadmap for future studies based on gaps identified by our review and discuss advantages and disadvantages of our granular dimensional framework.

Indexed as

SleepSleep Wake DisordersAdultEmpirical ResearchHumansSelf ReportAffectConceptual reviewFrameworkGranularityMethodsSleepTimescales

Identifiers

PMID36088755
PMCPMC10228665
OpenAlexW4292241887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.