Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36088727›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis and related disorders2022

Multiple sclerosis and COVID-19: Assessing risk perception, patient behaviors and access to disease-modifying therapies.

R Beesley, M Cauchi, L Davies, M Upcott, E Norton, S Loveless, V Anderson, R Wynford-Thomas, T P Pickersgill, E Uzochukwu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multiple sclerosis and COVID-19: a northern China survey.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

R BeesleyInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
M CauchiInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
L DaviesDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
M UpcottInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
E NortonInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
S LovelessInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
V AndersonInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
R Wynford-ThomasInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
T P PickersgillDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
E UzochukwuInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
M WardleDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
N P RobertsonInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
E TallantyreInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
M D WillisInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK. Electronic address: willismd@cardiff.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the outbreak of COVID-19, global healthcare systems have had to rapidly adapt. People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) were required to make decisions about their individual risk and consequent work and social behaviors. This study aimed to evaluate risk perception and patterns of shielding behavior amongst pwMS at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent impact on patients' employment and access to disease modifying therapies (DMTs).

methodsPostal surveys were sent to 1690 people within a UK population-based MS cohort during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients were surveyed on: (i) perceived vulnerability to COVID-19; (ii) isolation behavior; (iii) interruption to DMT; (iv) employment status; (v) level of satisfaction with their current working arrangement.

resultsResponses were received from 1000 pwMS. Two thirds of patients reported isolating at home during the first wave of the pandemic. This behavior was associated with increased age (p<0.0001), higher disability (p<0.0001) and use of high-efficacy DMTs (p = 0.02). The majority of patients reported feeling vulnerable (82%) with perceived vulnerability associated with higher EDSS (p<0.0001) and receiving a high-efficacy DMT (p = 0.04). Clinician-defined risk was associated with shielding behavior, with those at high-risk more likely to self-isolate/shield (p<0.0001). Patients on high-efficacy DMTs were more likely to have an interruption to their treatment (50%) during the first wave of the pandemic. Most pwMS experienced a change to their working environment, and most were satisfied with the adjustments.

conclusionThis study highlights the risk perception, social behavioral practices and changes to treatment experienced by pwMS during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in a large, well-described UK cohort. The results may help inform management of pwMS during future pandemic waves.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsPerceptionCOVID-19Disease-modifying therapiesMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID36088727
PMCPMC9381979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.