Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36088478›Full record

ReviewModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2022

Recommendations on compiling test datasets for evaluating artificial intelligence solutions in pathology.

André Homeyer, Christian Geißler, Lars Ole Schwen, Falk Zakrzewski, Theodore Evans, Klaus Strohmenger, Max Westphal, Roman David Bülow, Michaela Kargl, Aray Karjauv and 20 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

André Homeyer *Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Max-von-Laue-Straße 2, 28359, Bremen, Germany. andre.homeyer@mevis.fraunhofer.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9910-7136
Christian Geißler *Technische Universität Berlin, DAI-Labor, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2464-4842
Lars Ole Schwen *Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Max-von-Laue-Straße 2, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0195-9603
Falk Zakrzewski *Institute of Pathology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital Dresden (UKD), TU Dresden (TUD), Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Theodore Evans *Technische Universität Berlin, DAI-Labor, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Klaus Strohmenger *Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Max Westphal *Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Max-von-Laue-Straße 2, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Roman David Bülow *Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8527-7353
Michaela KarglMedical University of Graz, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8010, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8431-9710
Aray KarjauvTechnische Universität Berlin, DAI-Labor, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Isidre Munné-BertranMoticEurope, S.L.U., C. Les Corts, 12 Poligono Industrial, 08349, Barcelona, Spain.
Carl Orge RetzlaffTechnische Universität Berlin, DAI-Labor, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Adrià Romero-LópezLakera AI AG, Zelgstrasse 7, 8003, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-3680
Tomasz SołtysińskiQuIP GmbH, Reinhardtstraße 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Markus PlassMedical University of Graz, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Rita CarvalhoCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Peter SteinbachHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328, Dresden, Germany.
Yu-Chia LanInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Nassim BouteldjaInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
David HaberLakera AI AG, Zelgstrasse 7, 8003, Zürich, Switzerland.
Mateo Rojas-CarullaLakera AI AG, Zelgstrasse 7, 8003, Zürich, Switzerland.
Alireza Vafaei SadrInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Matthias KraftLakera AI AG, Zelgstrasse 7, 8003, Zürich, Switzerland.
Daniel KrügerOlympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH, Johann-Krane-Weg 39, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Rutger FickTribun Health, 2 Rue du Capitaine Scott, 75015, Paris, France.
Tobias LangMindpeak GmbH, Zirkusweg 2, 20359, Hamburg, Germany.
Peter BoorInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9921-4284
Heimo MüllerMedical University of Graz, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Diagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 6, 8010, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9691-4872
Peter HufnaglCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Norman ZerbeCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis. Prior to routine use, it is important to evaluate their predictive performance and obtain regulatory approval. This assessment requires appropriate test datasets. However, compiling such datasets is challenging and specific recommendations are missing. A committee of various stakeholders, including commercial AI developers, pathologists, and researchers, discussed key aspects and conducted extensive literature reviews on test datasets in pathology. Here, we summarize the results and derive general recommendations on compiling test datasets. We address several questions: Which and how many images are needed? How to deal with low-prevalence subsets? How can potential bias be detected? How should datasets be reported? What are the regulatory requirements in different countries? The recommendations are intended to help AI developers demonstrate the utility of their products and to help pathologists and regulatory agencies verify reported performance measures. Further research is needed to formulate criteria for sufficiently representative test datasets so that AI solutions can operate with less user intervention and better support diagnostic workflows in the future.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePathologyDatasets as TopicForecastingHumans

Identifiers

PMID36088478
PMCPMC9708586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.