ArticleScientific reports2022
CBCT artefact-burden of zirconia-based as compared to titanium implants for different beam energies: an analytical approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ex Vivo Quantitative Evaluation of Beam Hardening Artifacts at Various Implant Locations in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Using Metal Artifact Reduction and Noise Reduction Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of imaging protocol and tube current adjustment on the radiation dose in CBCT imaging of mandibular incisors.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Assessment of Radiation Attenuation Properties in Dental Implants Using Monte Carlo Method.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Exomass-Related Artefacts Caused by Dental Implants of Different Materials in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans: An Ex Vivo Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Profile Around Dental Implants Placed in the Esthetic Zone.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Comparison of 96-kV and 120-kV cone-beam CT for the assessment of cochlear implants.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Phantom study for CT artifacts of dental titanium implants and zirconia upper structures: the effects of occlusal plane angle setting and SEMAR algorithm.Oral radiology · 2024Article
- Performance of different cone-beam computed tomography scan modes with and without metal artifact reduction in detection of recurrent dental caries under various restorative materials.Polish journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Biocompatibility and osteoinductive ability of casein phosphopeptide modified polyetheretherketone.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beam hardening artefacts induced by highly-dense material (e.g. metal) is a common quality issue in maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT-) images. This experimental and analytical study investigated attenuation patterns of two typical dental implant materials: zirconia-ceramic and pure titanium. By application of different x-ray beam energies (60, 70, 80, 90 [kVp]) energy-dependent attenuation of these materials is assessed and the resulting artefact induction in the resulting CBCT-images evaluated. A zirconia (Y-TZP-) implant ([Formula: see text]: 4.1 mm) and a pure titanium rod ([Formula: see text]: 4.0 mm) were exposed in a commercial CBCT (3D Accuitomo 170). The raw two-dimensional (2D) projection radiographs the CBCT utilizes for three-dimensional reconstruction applied for acquisition of attenuation profiles through the circular central slice of the implant-phantom images. Distances the x-rays traverse through the implant-phantoms at this location were computed. Using this information and the linear attenuation coefficient, transmission and attenuation was computed for each material and beam energy. These data were related to beam hardening artefacts that were assessed in the axial reconstructions of the implants' CBCT images. Transmission of titanium for all peak kilovoltages (kVp) was higher and approximately 200% that of Y-TZP at 60 kVp versus 530% at 90 kVp. At 4 mm diameter transmission for Y-TZP was only approximately 5 % for all four beam-energies. In agreement with this finding, beam hardening artefacts for Y-TZP could not be reduced using higher energies, whereas for titanium they decreased with increasing energy. For the energy spectrum used in this study (60-90 kVp), beam hardening caused by titanium can be reduced using higher energies while this is not the case for zirconia-ceramic (Y-TZP).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.