ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2022
PBPK model for antibody disposition in mouse brain: validation using large-pore microdialysis data.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of monoclonal antibody disposition predictions using different physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling platforms.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Article
- Translational two-pore PBPK model to characterize whole-body disposition of different-size endogenous and exogenous proteins.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Article
- Investigation of Antibody Pharmacokinetics in the Brain Following Intra-CNS Administration and Development of PBPK Model to Characterize the Data.The AAPS journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this manuscript was to validate a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model developed to characterize brain pharmacokinetics (PK) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) using novel large-pore microdialysis data generated in mice. To support this objective, brain, CSF, and ISF PK of a human anti-tetanus toxin (TeTx) antibody was measured in mice following intraperitoneal (IP) administration. This antibody has no binding in mice. In addition, our recently published mouse brain PK data generated following intravenous (IV) and IP administration of trastuzumab in mice, and other published PK data for brain disposition of antibody in mice, were used to evaluate the PBPK model. All the model parameters were obtained from literature or kept the same as in our previously published manuscript. The revised PBPK model was able to characterize the PK of antibodies in mice brain, CSF, and ISF reasonably well (i.e., within a three-fold error). However, a priori selected parameters led to underprediction of ISF PK during the initial phase of the profile. A local sensitivity analysis suggested that minor changes in several brain-related parameters can help overcome this discrepancy, where an increase in the convective flow of antibodies across BBB was found to be the most parsimonious way to capture all the PK profiles well. However, the presence of this pathway needs further validation. As such, here we have presented an improved PBPK model to characterize and predict the PK of mAbs in different regions of the mouse brain following systemic administration. This model can serve as a quantitative tool to facilitate the discovery, preclinical evaluation, and preclinical-to-clinical translation of novel antibodies targeted against CNS disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.