ArticleBDJ open2022
Vibroacoustic analysis of dental air turbine noise.
Article in BDJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study is to analyze the noise mechanism of dental air turbine handpiece with vibroacoustic simulation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe operational part of the Gentle Silence Lux 8000B (KaVo Dental GmbH) was disassembled and scanned. The scanned data were rendered to smooth irregularities and then virtually reassembled. The rendering was 3D mesh modeled for the analysis. And, the interior void space and exterior space was mesh modeled as air layer. As per simulation input informations, the material property of steel was provided for the handpiece components. Supplied air pressure of 0.22 MPa at the inlet and static temperature of 25 °C was provided as operating conditions. Twenty virtual microphones were arrayed to measure the noise. Vibroacoustic noise simulation was performed with ACTRAN 2021 (MSC software corporation).
resultsThe mean value of noise ranged from 49.88 to 66.38 dB while the peak value ranged from 69.53 to 81.64 dB depending on the microphone position. All microphones showed the similar noise pattern which had peak amplitude at around 4500 Hz. The calculated natural frequency of interior air layer was 4478.92 Hz and 7573.77 Hz. DISCUSSION: The simulated result showed similar tonal noise of dental handpiece suggesting air resonance phenomenon as a possible cause of dental handpiece noise.
conclusionVibroacoustic analysis of the air layer contained within the dental air turbine handpiece showed the resonance peak noise at 4478.92 Hz under the simulated conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.