ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2022
Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability.
Review in International journal for equity in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Responsible inclusion: A systematic review of consent to social-behavioral research with adults with intellectual disability in the US.Disability and health journal · 2024Pooled it
- Designing and Delivering a Dissemination Programme With Co-Researchers With Intellectual Disabilities.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026Article
- Investigating Cancer literacy and help-seeking barriers among individuals with intellectual disabilities in Hungary.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- "Stigma," Survival, and Intergenerational Cultural Influences: Latina Autistic Contributions Through Community-Engaged Research.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2026Article
- Engagement to Identify Health Priorities of People With Intellectual and/or Developmental Disability.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2026Article
- Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Aligning Biomedical Research With Neurodiversity to Support the Metabolic Health of Autistic Individuals.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
- Promoting Accessible Research for Children With Intellectual Disabilities; Lessons Learnt From Adaptations Through the Covid-19 Pandemic.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2026Article
- Researchers' roadblocks to including people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (DD) in research: Translational science and I/DD program leaders insights.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- A Call for Inclusion: Children With Intellectual Disabilities in Trauma Treatment Research.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2025Article
- A multicenter observational cohort study in survivors of Down Syndrome-associated acute leukemia (ALTE22C1): a report from the Children's Oncology Group.BMC cancer · 2025Observational
- An Analysis of Institutional Review Board Policies for Enrollment of Adults with Impaired or Uncertain Decision-Making Capacity.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2025Article
- A Scoping Review of the Ways Gatekeepers May Hinder or Promote Opportunities for People With Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities to Learn About Research Participation.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2025Article
- Breaking barriers: a commentary on research gaps in cancer and depression among individuals with intellectual disabilities.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Reducing translational science roadblocks to disability research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Inclusive research with individuals with Down syndrome at risk for dementia.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2025Review
- Using the Three-Minute Speech Sample to Examine the Parent-Adolescent Relationship in Autistic Youth: A Qualitative Analysis.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024Article
- Just Research: Evaluation findings of an educational program to promote inclusive research among investigators and research staff.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Correction: Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- "I Want to Know Everything ... ": The Return of Research Results and the Importance of Transparency in the Acceptability of Lumbar Punctures for African American Older Adults.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in health equity rely on representation of diverse groups in population health research samples. Despite progress in the diversification of research samples, continued expansion to include systematically excluded groups is needed to address health inequities. One such group that is infrequently represented in population health research are adults with intellectual disability. Individuals with intellectual disability experience pervasive health disparities. Representation in population health research is crucial to determine the root causes of inequity, understand the health of diverse populations, and address health disparities. The purpose of this paper was to develop recommendations for researchers to increase the accessibility of university health research and to support the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as participants in health research.
methodsA comprehensive literature review, consultation with the university ethics review board, and review of United States federal regulations was completed to identify barriers to research participation for individuals with intellectual disability. A collaborative stakeholder working group developed recommendations and products to increase the accessibility of university research for participants with intellectual disability.
resultsEleven key barriers to research participation were identified including gaps in researchers' knowledge, lack of trust, accessibility and communication challenges, and systematic exclusion among others. Together the stakeholder working group compiled seven general recommendations for university health researchers to guide inclusion efforts. Recommendations included: 1) address the knowledge gap, 2) build community partnerships, 3) use plain language, 4) simplify consent and assent processes, 5) establish research capacity to consent, 6) offer universal supports and accommodations, and 7) practice accessible dissemination. In addition, four products were created as part of the stakeholder working group to be shared with researchers to support the inclusion of participants with intellectual disability. 1) Supports I Need Checklist, 2) Plain language glossary of health and research terms, 3) Understanding Consent and Assent in Plain Language, 4) Easy-Read Paper Template.
conclusionCommunity members and individuals with intellectual disability want to be included in research and are eager to engage as research participants. It is the responsibility of the researcher to open the door to university health research. The recommendations discussed in this paper could increase accessibility for a broader range of research participants and, in particular, promote the inclusion of individuals with intellectual disability to advance health equity in population health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.