Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36088330›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Mental health workers' perspectives on peer support in high-, middle- and low income settings: a focus group study.

Silvia Krumm, Maria Haun, Selina Hiller, Ashleigh Charles, Jasmine Kalha, Jackie Niwemuhwezi, Rebecca Nixdorf, Bernd Puschner, Grace Ryan, Donat Shamba and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Silvia Krumm *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany. silvia.krumm@uni-ulm.de.
Maria Haun *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany.
Selina HillerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany.
Ashleigh CharlesSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jasmine KalhaCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India.
Jackie NiwemuhweziButabika National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Rebecca NixdorfDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Bernd PuschnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm/Guenzburg, Germany.
Grace RyanCentre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Donat ShambaDepartment of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Paula Garber Epstein *Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Galia Moran *Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.
Universität Ulm · DEBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILButabika Hospital · UGIfakara Health Institute · TZIndian Law Institute · INLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBTel Aviv University · ILUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer support is increasingly acknowledged as an integral part of mental health services around the world. However, most research on peer support comes from high-income countries, with little attention to similarities and differences between different settings and how these affect implementation. Mental health workers have an important role to play in integrating formal peer support into statutory services, and their attitudes toward peer support can represent either a barrier to or facilitator of successful implementation. Thus, this study investigates mental health workers' attitudes toward peer support across a range of high- (Germany, Israel), middle- (India), and low-income country (Tanzania, Uganda) settings.

methodsSix focus groups were conducted in Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel), and Ahmedabad, Gujarat (India) with a total of 35 participants. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

resultsParticipants across the study sites demonstrated overall positive attitudes towards peer support in mental health care, although some concerns were raised on potentially harmful effects of peer support such as negative role modelling and giving inadequate advice to service users. Notably, mental health workers from low- and middle-income countries described peer support workers as bridge-builders and emphasized the mutual benefits of peer support. Mental health workers' views on peer support workers' roles and role boundaries differed between sites. In some settings, mental health workers strongly agreed on the need for role clarity, whereas in others, mental health workers expressed mixed views, with some preferring blurred role boundaries. Regarding collaboration, mental health workers described peer support workers as supporters and utilizers, equal partners or emphasized a need for trust and commitment.

conclusionsMental health workers' attitudes toward peer support workers were positive overall, but they also varied depending on local context, resources and previous experiences with peer support. This affected their conceptions of peer support workers' roles, role clarity, and collaboration. This study demonstrated that reconciling the need for local adaptations and safeguarding the core values of peer support is necessary and possible, especially when the implementation of recovery-oriented interventions such as peer support is accelerating worldwide.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthFocus GroupsHumansPeer GroupTanzaniaFocus groupsHigh-, middle- and low income settingsMental health workersPeer support

Identifiers

PMID36088330
PMCPMC9464408
OpenAlexW4295117919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.