Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36088285›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Struct2Graph: a graph attention network for structure based predictions of protein-protein interactions.

Mayank Baranwal, Abram Magner, Jacob Saldinger, Emine S Turali-Emre, Paolo Elvati, Shivani Kozarekar, J Scott VanEpps, Nicholas A Kotov, Angela Violi, Alfred O Hero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Biomolecular Interaction Prediction: The Era of AI.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mayank BaranwalDivision of Data and Decision Sciences, Tata Consultancy Services Research, Mumbai, India. baranwal.mayank@tcs.com.
Abram MagnerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Albany, SUNY, Albany, USA.
Jacob SaldingerDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Emine S Turali-Emre *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Paolo Elvati *Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Shivani KozarekarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
J Scott VanEppsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Nicholas A KotovDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Angela VioliDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Alfred O HeroDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

Army Research Office W911NF-19-1-0269Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency HR00111720067Office of Naval Research N000141812876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopment of new methods for analysis of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) at molecular and nanometer scales gives insights into intracellular signaling pathways and will improve understanding of protein functions, as well as other nanoscale structures of biological and abiological origins. Recent advances in computational tools, particularly the ones involving modern deep learning algorithms, have been shown to complement experimental approaches for describing and rationalizing PPIs. However, most of the existing works on PPI predictions use protein-sequence information, and thus have difficulties in accounting for the three-dimensional organization of the protein chains.

resultsIn this study, we address this problem and describe a PPI analysis based on a graph attention network, named Struct2Graph, for identifying PPIs directly from the structural data of folded protein globules. Our method is capable of predicting the PPI with an accuracy of 98.89% on the balanced set consisting of an equal number of positive and negative pairs. On the unbalanced set with the ratio of 1:10 between positive and negative pairs, Struct2Graph achieves a fivefold cross validation average accuracy of 99.42%. Moreover, Struct2Graph can potentially identify residues that likely contribute to the formation of the protein-protein complex. The identification of important residues is tested for two different interaction types: (a) Proteins with multiple ligands competing for the same binding area, (b) Dynamic protein-protein adhesion interaction. Struct2Graph identifies interacting residues with 30% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 87% accuracy.

conclusionsIn this manuscript, we address the problem of prediction of PPIs using a first of its kind, 3D-structure-based graph attention network (code available at https://github.com/baranwa2/Struct2Graph ). Furthermore, the novel mutual attention mechanism provides insights into likely interaction sites through its unsupervised knowledge selection process. This study demonstrates that a relatively low-dimensional feature embedding learned from graph structures of individual proteins outperforms other modern machine learning classifiers based on global protein features. In addition, through the analysis of single amino acid variations, the attention mechanism shows preference for disease-causing residue variations over benign polymorphisms, demonstrating that it is not limited to interface residues.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceMachine LearningAmino AcidsProteinsDeep learningGraph attention networkProtein–protein interactionStructure-based prediction

Identifiers

PMID36088285
PMCPMC9464414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.