Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2022
Anti-C5a antibody (vilobelimab) therapy for critically ill, invasively mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 (PANAMO): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on the Treatment and Management of COVID-19: Vilobelimab.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Guideline
- The cost-effectiveness of using vilobelimab with immunomodulators to treat severely ill mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: A subgroup analysis of the PANAMO study.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026Trial
- Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of STSA-1002, recombinant anti-human C5a fully human monoclonal antibody, in a randomized, first-in-human phase I study in healthy adults.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Regional comparison of efficacy and safety for vilobelimab in critically ill, invasively mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Trial
- Heterogeneity of treatment effect of vilobelimab in COVID-19: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and safety of baricitinib or ravulizumab in adult patients with severe COVID-19 (TACTIC-R): a randomised, parallel-arm, open-label, phase 4 trial.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2023Trial
- Recombinant C1 inhibitor in the prevention of severe COVID-19: a randomized, open-label, multi-center phase IIa trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Trial
- Anti-C5a antibody vilobelimab treatment and the effect on biomarkers of inflammation and coagulation in patients with severe COVID-19: a substudy of the phase 2 PANAMO trial.Respiratory research · 2022Trial
- Differential virulence potential of different clades of multidrug-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of pyroptosis in sepsis‑induced acute lung injury (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Innate immunity: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Distinct Patterns of Clinical Features and Cardiac Biomarker Elevation in Community-Acquired Pneumonia and COVID-19 Pneumonia.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of complement therapeutics in rheumatology.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles as Drivers of Lung Endothelial Dysfunction in ARDS: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.Comprehensive Physiology · 2026Review
- Targeting Immune Dysregulation After Burn Injury for Improved Healing and Outcomes.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Computational proteomics to enhance personalized treatment of COVID-19 and Long COVID.Clinical proteomics · 2026Review
- Differential virulence potential of different clades of multidrug-resistantmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The Complement System in the Setting of Critical Illness-A Narrative Review.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Evolving Therapeutic Strategies in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: Current Standards and Emerging Targets for GPA and MPA.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Modes of (Inter)Actions of Polyvalent Immunoglobulins: Nonclinical and Clinical Research in Severe Bacterial Infections.Biomedicines · 2026Review
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
26 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVilobelimab, an anti-C5a monoclonal antibody, was shown to be safe in a phase 2 trial of invasively mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Here, we aimed to determine whether vilobelimab in addition to standard of care improves survival outcomes in this patient population.
methodsThis randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trial was performed at 46 hospitals in the Netherlands, Germany, France, Belgium, Russia, Brazil, Peru, Mexico, and South Africa. Participants aged 18 years or older who were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, but not more than 48 h after intubation at time of first infusion, had a PaO
findingsFrom Oct 1, 2020, to Oct 4, 2021, we included 368 patients in the ITT analysis (full analysis set; 177 in the vilobelimab group and 191 in the placebo group). One patient in the vilobelimab group was excluded from the primary analysis due to random assignment in error without treatment. At least one dose of study treatment was given to 364 (99%) patients (safety analysis set). 54 patients (31%) of 177 in the vilobelimab group and 77 patients (40%) of 191 in the placebo group died in the first 28 days. The all-cause mortality rate at 28 days was 32% (95% CI 25-39) in the vilobelimab group and 42% (35-49) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·73, 95% CI 0·50-1·06; p=0·094). In the predefined analysis without site-stratification, vilobelimab significantly reduced all-cause mortality at 28 days (HR 0·67, 95% CI 0·48-0·96; p=0·027). The most common TEAEs were acute kidney injury (35 [20%] of 175 in the vilobelimab group vs 40 [21%] of 189 in the placebo), pneumonia (38 [22%] vs 26 [14%]), and septic shock (24 [14%] vs 31 [16%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 103 (59%) of 175 patients in the vilobelimab group versus 120 (63%) of 189 in the placebo group.
interpretationIn addition to standard of care, vilobelimab improves survival of invasive mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 and leads to a significant decrease in mortality. Vilobelimab could be considered as an additional therapy for patients in this setting and further research is needed on the role of vilobelimab and C5a in other acute respiratory distress syndrome-causing viral infections.
fundingInflaRx and the German Federal Government.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.