Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36087611›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2022

Anti-C5a antibody (vilobelimab) therapy for critically ill, invasively mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 (PANAMO): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Alexander P J Vlaar, Martin Witzenrath, Pieter van Paassen, Leo M A Heunks, Bruno Mourvillier, Sanne de Bruin, Endry H T Lim, Matthijs C Brouwer, Pieter R Tuinman, José F K Saraiva and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on the Treatment and Management of COVID-19: Vilobelimab.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Guideline
  2. The cost-effectiveness of using vilobelimab with immunomodulators to treat severely ill mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: A subgroup analysis of the PANAMO study.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Innate immunity: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Differential virulence potential of different clades of multidrug-resistantmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.

Alexander P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: a.p.vlaar@amsterdamumc.nl.
Martin WitzenrathDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Center for Lung Research, Berlin, Germany.
Pieter van PaassenDepartment of Immunology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Leo M A HeunksDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bruno MourvillierMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Sanne de BruinDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Endry H T LimDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Matthijs C BrouwerDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Pieter R TuinmanDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
José F K SaraivaInstituto de Pesquisa Clínica de Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Gernot MarxUniklinik RWTH Aachen, Klinik für Operative Intensivmedizin und Intermediate Care, Aachen, Germany.
Suzana M LoboHospital de Base, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil.
Rodrigo BoldoAssociação Educadora São Carlos, Hospital Mãe de Deus, Centro de Pesquisa, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Jesus A Simon-CamposGeneral Hospital Agustin O'Horán, Köhler and Milstein Research, Mérida, Mexico.
Alexander D CornetMedisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Anastasia GrebenyukMUZ City Clinical Hospital 5, Barnaul, Russia.
Johannes M EngelbrechtVergelegen Mediclinic, Cape Town, South Africa.
Murimisi MukansiHelen Joseph Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Philippe G JorensAntwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Robert ZerbibInflaRx, Jena, Germany.
Simon RückingerMetronomia Clinical Research, Munich, Germany.
Korinna PilzInflaRx, Jena, Germany.
Renfeng GuoInflaRx Pharmaceuticals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Diederik van de BeekDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Niels C RiedemannInflaRx, Jena, Germany.
PANAMO study group
University of Amsterdam · NLInflarx (Germany) · DEAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAntwerp University Hospital · BEHospital de Base · BRHospital Mãe de Deus · BRInstituto de Medicina Avançada · BRMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLRight to Care · ZAUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEBiomatériaux et Bioingénierie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECity Clinical Hospital · RUGerman Center for Lung Research · DEHelen Joseph Hospital · ZARegional Public Health Care Institution "City Hospital No. 5, Barnaul" · RUUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVilobelimab, an anti-C5a monoclonal antibody, was shown to be safe in a phase 2 trial of invasively mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Here, we aimed to determine whether vilobelimab in addition to standard of care improves survival outcomes in this patient population.

methodsThis randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trial was performed at 46 hospitals in the Netherlands, Germany, France, Belgium, Russia, Brazil, Peru, Mexico, and South Africa. Participants aged 18 years or older who were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, but not more than 48 h after intubation at time of first infusion, had a PaO

findingsFrom Oct 1, 2020, to Oct 4, 2021, we included 368 patients in the ITT analysis (full analysis set; 177 in the vilobelimab group and 191 in the placebo group). One patient in the vilobelimab group was excluded from the primary analysis due to random assignment in error without treatment. At least one dose of study treatment was given to 364 (99%) patients (safety analysis set). 54 patients (31%) of 177 in the vilobelimab group and 77 patients (40%) of 191 in the placebo group died in the first 28 days. The all-cause mortality rate at 28 days was 32% (95% CI 25-39) in the vilobelimab group and 42% (35-49) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·73, 95% CI 0·50-1·06; p=0·094). In the predefined analysis without site-stratification, vilobelimab significantly reduced all-cause mortality at 28 days (HR 0·67, 95% CI 0·48-0·96; p=0·027). The most common TEAEs were acute kidney injury (35 [20%] of 175 in the vilobelimab group vs 40 [21%] of 189 in the placebo), pneumonia (38 [22%] vs 26 [14%]), and septic shock (24 [14%] vs 31 [16%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 103 (59%) of 175 patients in the vilobelimab group versus 120 (63%) of 189 in the placebo group.

interpretationIn addition to standard of care, vilobelimab improves survival of invasive mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 and leads to a significant decrease in mortality. Vilobelimab could be considered as an additional therapy for patients in this setting and further research is needed on the role of vilobelimab and C5a in other acute respiratory distress syndrome-causing viral infections.

fundingInflaRx and the German Federal Government.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, MonoclonalCritical IllnessDouble-Blind MethodHumansRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonalvilobelimab

Identifiers

PMID36087611
PMCPMC9451499
OpenAlexW4295434145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.