Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36087251›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2022

Narrative Review of the Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Inhaler Handling Errors in the Control of Asthma and COPD.

Raúl De Simón Gutiérrez, Raúl Piedra Castro

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raúl De Simón GutiérrezPrimary Care Physician, Luis Vives Health Center, Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain. rasimgu@yahoo.es.ORCID 0000-0002-1031-8931
Raúl Piedra CastroPrimary Care Physician, Henares Azuqueca Health Center, Guadalajara, Spain.
Universidad de Alcalá · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAsthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic respiratory diseases that remain uncontrolled in many patients, despite the wide range of therapeutic options available. This review analyzes the available clinical evidence on 3 budesonide/formoterol DPI devices, Spiromax RECENT

findingsThe effectiveness of dry powder inhalers (DPI) depends largely on the device and the patient's inhaler technique. Equally important are the patient's perception of the inhaler and adherence. Given the high burden of these diseases, it is important that efforts be made to select the best DPI for each patient and to analyze the impact of these variables to help improve the health and quality of life of our patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the present knowledge about PROs, inhaler handling errors, and asthma and COPD control achieved by Spiromax

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationBronchodilator AgentsBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationDry Powder InhalersHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeBronchodilator AgentsBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationAsthmaCOPDDry powder inhalersInhaler errorPatient-reported outcomesSpiromax

Identifiers

PMID36087251
PMCPMC9532287
OpenAlexW4296295673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.