ArticleChromosoma1987
Evolutionary relationships of the Chinese hamster X chromosome and autosomes: a comparison using solution hybridization techniques.
Article in Chromosoma, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The evolutionary relationships of Chinese hamster X chromosome and autosome DNA sequences were compared by solution hybridization techniques. Chinese hamster X chromosome tracer was prepared by radiolabeling DNA from chromosomes isolated by fluorescence-activated sorting. Radiolabeled Chinese hamster total genomic DNA, approximately 90% of which is of autosome origin, was used as autosome tracer. Each tracer was mixed with excess driver DNA of Chinese hamster, Syrian hamster, rat, rabbit, cat, cow, or human origin. Reaction mixtures were melted and allowed to reassociate to an equivalent CoT of 12,000, under conditions which permitted 35% mismatch in DNA duplexes. Both the extent of duplex formation (the normalized percentage hybridization or NPH) and the average thermal stability of the duplexes formed (melting temperature or Tm) were measured; these values were used to compare the evolutionary relatedness of tracer and driver DNAs. The pattern of evolutionary relatedness revealed by comparing either the Tm or NPH values obtained with different drivers was the same for X chromosome and autosome DNA and was consistent with the phylogeny of the species examined. Although NPH and Tm values for X chromosome and autosome tracers differed, differences fell within the range of experimental error. The results of these studies provide no evidence for differential conservation of Chinese hamster X chromosome sequences, suggesting that the constraints on the mammalian X chromosome which act to maintain its gene linkage group intact do not markedly reduce the extent to which its sequences diverge during evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.