SynthesisSleep2022
Measuring sleep health in primary school-aged children: A systematic review of instruments and their content validity.
Synthesis in Sleep, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Measures of Sleep-Related Fears in Children: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties Using COSMIN.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of technology use on sleep quality in primary school-aged children.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Sleep Health and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with NF1: A Biopsychosocial Perspective.Cancers · 2026Article
- Exploring Caregiver Perceptions of Child Sleep Quality Among a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Sample: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Parental educational aspirations and children's sleep: a mediation analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Agreement between parental reports and accelerometer measures of sleep duration in primary school children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Obstructive sleep apnea in children: prevalence and association with overweight and obesity.Frontiers in sleep · 2025Article
- Assessing sleep behaviors in Latino children and adolescents: what is known, what are we missing, and how do we move forward?Current opinion in pediatrics · 2024Review
- Covariance patterns between sleep health domains and distributed intrinsic functional connectivity.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesThis review aimed to summarize instruments that measure one or more domains of sleep health (i.e. duration, quality, efficiency, timing, daytime sleepiness and sleep-related behaviors) in a general population of 4-12-year old children, and to assess these instruments' content validity. Other measurement properties were evaluated for instruments with indications of sufficient content validity.
methodsA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and EmBase. Methodological quality, content validity, and other measurement properties were assessed via the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Instruments with indications of sufficient content validity (i.e. relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility) were further evaluated on other measurement properties (i.e. other aspects of validity, reliability, responsiveness). A modified GRADE approach was applied to determine the quality of evidence.
resultsTwenty instruments, containing 36 subscales, were included. None of the instruments measured all sleep health domains. For five (subscales of) instruments sufficient relevance and comprehensibility was found. The quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. For these five instruments all additional measurement properties were assessed. Sufficient results were found for structural validity (n = 1), internal consistency (n = 1), and construct validity (n = 1), with quality of evidence ranging from very low to high.
conclusionsSeveral (subscales of) instruments measuring domains of child sleep health showed good promise, demonstrating sufficient relevance, comprehensibility, and some also sufficient results on other measurement properties. However, more high quality studies on instrument development and the evaluation of measurement properties are required.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021224109.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.