Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36087049›Full record

ReviewMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2022

A review of causal discovery methods for molecular network analysis.

Jack Kelly, Carlo Berzuini, Bernard Keavney, Maciej Tomaszewski, Hui Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jack KellyCentre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-4649
Carlo BerzuiniCentre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Bernard KeavneyDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Maciej TomaszewskiDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Hui GuoCentre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/13/2/30154British Heart Foundation RG/F/21/110050British Heart Foundation SP/19/10/34813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increasing availability and size of multi-omics datasets, investigating the casual relationships between molecular phenotypes has become an important aspect of exploring underlying biology andgenetics. There are an increasing number of methodlogies that have been developed and applied to moleular networks to investigate these causal interactions.

methodsWe have introduced and reviewed the available methods for building large-scale causal molecular networks that have been developed and applied in the past decade.

resultsIn this review we have identified and summarized the existing methods for infering causality in large-scale causal molecular networks, and discussed important factors that will need to be considered in future research in this area.

conclusionExisting methods to infering causal molecular networks have their own strengths and limitations so there is no one best approach, and it is instead down to the discretion of the researcher. This review also to discusses some of the current limitations to biological interpretation of these networks, and important factors to consider for future studies on molecular networks.

Indexed as

CausalityPhenotypeBayesian networkscausal inferencecausal molecular networkmendelian randomisationomics

Identifiers

PMID36087049
PMCPMC9544222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.