Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36086948›Full record

ReviewHuman mutation2022

Rapid genome sequencing for pediatrics.

Jana Jezkova, Sophie Shaw, Nicola V Taverner, Hywel J Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human mutation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Variants ofBiomedical reports · 2023
    Article
  15. Diagnostic genomic sequencing in critically ill children.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. [Neonate-onset ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jana JezkovaAll Wales Medical Genomics Service, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Heath Hospital, Cardiff, UK.
Sophie ShawAll Wales Medical Genomics Service, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Heath Hospital, Cardiff, UK.
Nicola V TavernerAll Wales Medical Genomics Service, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Heath Hospital, Cardiff, UK.
Hywel J WilliamsDivision of Cancer and Genetics, Genetic and Genomic Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7758-0312
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancements made in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology over the past two decades have transformed our understanding of genetic variation in humans and had a profound impact on our ability to diagnose patients with rare genetic diseases. In this review, we discuss the recently developed application of rapid NGS techniques, used to diagnose pediatric patients with suspected rare diseases who are critically ill. We highlight the challenges associated with performing such clinical diagnostics tests in terms of the laboratory infrastructure, bioinformatic analysis pipelines, and the ethical considerations that need to be addressed. We end by looking at what future developments in this field may look like and how they can be used to augment the genetic data to further improve the diagnostic rates for these high-priority patients.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPediatricsChildChromosome MappingHumansbioinformaticsethicsnext-generation sequencing (NGS)rare diseasevariant interpretationwhole exome sequencing (WES)whole genome sequencing (WGS)

Identifiers

PMID36086948
PMCPMC9826377
OpenAlexW4295873044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.