Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36086926›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2023

Why a clinical trial is as good as its outcome measure: A framework for the selection and use of cognitive outcome measures for clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease.

Roos J Jutten, Kathryn V Papp, Suzanne Hendrix, Noel Ellison, Jessica B Langbaum, Michael C Donohue, Jason Hassenstab, Paul Maruff, Dorene M Rentz, John Harrison and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Research satisfaction among participants in a preclinical Alzheimer's disease trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Everyday functioning in young onset dementia: differences between diagnostic groups.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Roos J JuttenDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3712-4790
Kathryn V PappDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Suzanne HendrixPentara Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Noel EllisonPentara Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jessica B LangbaumBanner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Michael C DonohueAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA.
Jason HassenstabKnight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Paul MaruffCogstate Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dorene M RentzDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
John HarrisonMetis Cognition Ltd., Kilmington, UK.
Jeffrey CummingsChambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Philip ScheltensAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sietske A M SikkesAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Vascular factors, physical activity, and inflammation as modulators of neurodegenerative and cognitive trajectories (Project 2)P01AG036694 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI REISA A. SPERLING · 2010 to 2026
$50.2M
Trial-Ready Cohort for Preclinical/Prodromal Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG053798 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AISEN, PAUL S., CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L. · 2017 to 2022
$39.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STEVEN E ARNOLD · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072980 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI Nicholas Ashton · 2021 to 2026
$24.9M
Renewal of Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) (Phase 2) CNTN - ResubmissionP20GM109025 · NIGMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI JESSICA KIRKLAND CALDWELL · 2015 to 2026
$22.8M
Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Detection, Diagnosis, Course, and Risk FactorsU01NS093334 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L., REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2016 to 2022
$17.0M
NVEDARC Clinical CoreP20AG068053 · NIA · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI FOX, ROBERT J. · 2020 to 2022
$3.3M
Alzheimer's Clinical Trial InnOvatioN (ACTION) InitiativeR35AG071476 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L. · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG036694NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068053NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072980NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053798NIA NIH HHS R35 AG071476NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109025NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS093334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial aspect of any clinical trial is using the right outcome measure to assess treatment efficacy. Compared to the rapidly evolved understanding and measurement of pathophysiology in preclinical and early symptomatic stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), relatively less progress has been made in the evolution of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for those stages. The current paper aims to provide a benchmark for the design and evaluation of COAs for use in early AD trials. We discuss lessons learned on capturing cognitive changes in predementia stages of AD, including challenges when validating novel COAs for those early stages and necessary evidence for their implementation in clinical trials. Moving forward, we propose a multi-step framework to advance the use of more effective COAs to assess clinically meaningful changes in early AD, which will hopefully contribute to the much-needed consensus around more appropriate outcome measures to assess clinical efficacy of putative treatments. HIGHLIGHTS: We discuss lessons learned on capturing cognitive changes in predementia stages of AD. We propose a framework for the design and evaluation of performance based cognitive tests for use in early AD trials. We provide recommendations to facilitate the implementation of more effective cognitive outcome measures in AD trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitionHumansNeuropsychological TestsOutcome Assessment, Health CareTreatment OutcomeAlzheimer's diseaseclinical outcome assessmentsclinical trialcognitionpreclinicalprodromal

Identifiers

PMID36086926
PMCPMC9931632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.