Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36086882›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2022

Early repolarization in adolescent athletes: A gender comparison of ECG and echocardiographic characteristics.

Marco Vecchiato, Veronica Baioccato, Paolo Emilio Adami, Giulia Quinto, Giulia Foccardi, Giulio Slanzi, Francesca Battista, Daniel Neunhaeuserer, Andrea Ermolao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Sporting Careers After ICD Implantation in Elite Athletes.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Fragmented QRS Complex in Lead VJournal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco VecchiatoSports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2395-4977
Veronica BaioccatoSports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7054-5581
Paolo Emilio AdamiWorld Athletics, Medical Manager, Health and Science Department, Monaco, Monaco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-5342
Giulia QuintoSports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5653-275X
Giulia FoccardiSports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8170-4741
Giulio SlanziSports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Francesca BattistaSports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-1354
Daniel NeunhaeusererSports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9775-4260
Andrea ErmolaoSports and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0546-1514
University of Padua · ITInternational University of Monaco · MC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe early repolarization pattern (ERp) is an electrocardiographic finding previously associated with arrhythmic risk in adults. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of ERp in a group of adolescent athletes according to gender. Furthermore, potential associations with clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters are explored.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study young athletes (age < 18 years) were consecutively enrolled during the annual pre-participation evaluation, undergoing also transthoracic echocardiography assessment from January 2015 to March 2020.

resultsThe prevalence of ERp was 27% in the whole population. Athletes with ERp were more frequently men practicing endurance sports. Women with ERp showed lower heart rate at rest, greater posterior, and relative ventricular wall thickness than those without ERp. Men with ERp presented higher systolic blood pressure at peak exercise, greater septal wall thickness, and indexed left ventricular mass than those without ERp. Both genders with ERp showed increased QRS voltage and narrower QRS duration. The ERp phenotype in men was more frequently notched with higher amplitude and ascending ST segment. Women's ERp presented more frequently a slurred morphology, especially in the inferior leads, and horizontal ST slope. No differences emerged in the occurrence of arrhythmias at rest and during maximal exercise test between groups, even considering higher risk phenotypes.

conclusionsERp is an ECG finding compatible with normal cardiac adaptations to training in young athletes. ERp demonstrated gender differences regarding phenotypes previously associated with increased cardiovascular risk, not showing any differences in arrhythmias during maximal exercise test.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyElectrocardiographyArrhythmias, CardiacAthletesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalearrhythmic riskathlete's heartearly repolarizationpre-participation screeningyoung athlete

Identifiers

PMID36086882
PMCPMC9826079
OpenAlexW4295095150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.