ArticleMedicine2022
Comparison of duplex ultrasound and hemodynamic assessment with computed tomography angiography in patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodality Imaging of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Etiological and Anatomical Correlates.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Don't be perplexed by the plexus! A practical approach to brachial plexus ultrasound.BJR open · 2025Review
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) presents with a variety of neurovascular symptoms, and its diagnosis cannot be established purely on the basis of clinical assessments. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is currently the most useful investigative modality for patients with suspected vascular TOS. However, CTA facilities are limited, and CTA itself is an expensive and a resource-intensive technique associated with risks such as radiation exposure and contrast toxicity. Therefore, a screening test to identify the need for CTA may facilitate clinical management of patients with suspected TOS. Data for patients with suspected arterial TOS who underwent duplex ultrasound with arterial hemodynamic assessment (HDA) (pulse-volume recording and Doppler arterial pressure measurement) at King Saud University Medical City Vascular Lab between 2009 and 2018 were collected. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (NPV), and area under the curve for duplex ultrasound and arm arterial HDA with CTA were reviewed. The data for 49 patients (mean age, 31 ± 14 years) were reviewed, of which 71% were female. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV of duplex ultrasound were 86.7%, 49.3%, 26.5%, and 94.6%, respectively. For arm arterial HDA, these values were 73.3%, 78.9%, 42.3%, and 93.3%, respectively. The combination of arm arterial HDA with duplex ultrasound scores yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV of 93.3%, 42.3%, 25.5%, and 96.8%, respectively. The combination of duplex ultrasound with arm arterial HDA showed higher sensitivity and NPV than either test alone. The specificity of arm arterial HDA was significantly higher than that of the other measurements. When suspected, arterial TOS could be ruled out using duplex ultrasound and arm arterial HDA. These 2 investigations may help determine the need for CTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.