Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36086724›Full record

ArticleMedicine2022

Increased accuracy of FNA-based cytological diagnosis of pancreatic lesions by use of an ethanol-based fixative system: A STROBE compliant study.

Martin Bürger, Antje Heidrich, Iver Petersen, Andreas Stallmach, Carsten Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Martin BürgerClinic for Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8940-7696
Antje HeidrichClinic for Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Iver PetersenInstitute of Pathology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Andreas StallmachClinic for Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Carsten SchmidtMedical Clinic II (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology and Infectious Diseases), Fulda Hospital, Fulda, Germany.
Astellas Pharma (Japan) · JPUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EUS-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) is the gold standard of evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. However, accuracy is generally low. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of conventional cytology (CC) with liquid-based cytological analysis using an ethanol based fixative system (LBC) without onsite cytopathological assessment. We performed a retrospective evaluation in patients referred to the Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy at Jena University Hospital for FNA of pancreatic masses between 2008 and 2015. LBC preservation of specimen was introduced in April 2011. Gold standard was defined as a surgically obtained histology or a patient follow-up of at least 1 year for diagnosis or exclusion of malignancy. 172 patients were included into the final analysis. Mean age was 64.8 years (SD 12.4 years), 105 patients were male. 107 lesions were malignant, while 65 lesions were benign. 89 specimens were evaluated by CC, whereas 83 specimens were processed by LBC. Liquid-based cytology performed significantly better than conventional cytology in terms of sensitivity (87.8% vs 67.2% (P = .021)), specificity (100% vs 87.1% (P = .047)) negative predictive value (NPV) (85% vs 58.7% (P = .009)) and accuracy (92.8% vs 74.2% (P = .001)). We observed no learning curve after implementation of LBC Liquid based cytology is a simple and inexpensive technique that helps improving sensitivity, specificity, NPV and accuracy over conventional cytology in fine needle aspirates from patients with pancreatic lesions. Therefore, this real-world evidence shows, that EUS-FNA specimen processing should be performed using LBC to achieve best possible results.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationPancreatic NeoplasmsEthanolFemaleFixativesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEthanolFixatives

Identifiers

PMID36086724
PMCPMC10980422
OpenAlexW4295028353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.