ReviewMedicine2022
Surgical excision of giant vulvar angiofibroma: A case report and a review of literature.
Review in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Giant pedunculated cellular angiofibroma of the labia majora: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Massive cellular angiofibroma of the vulva: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleCellular angiofibroma (CA) is a rare tumor of the soft tissue classified as a benign fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumor. Considering this, the literature regarding CA mainly, but not exclusively, comprises single case reports and case series. Here, we report a case of giant CA of the vulva with comprehensive literature review. PATIENT CONCERNS: We present a case of a massive vulvar CA arising in 53-year-old woman with no notable medical or surgical history. The mass has grown considerably over time, causing pain and difficult urination, defecation, and movement. The patient had normal regular menstrual cycle with no previous contraception use. Vaginal examination exposed a right-sided large tender vulvar mass with normal-looking vagina. DIAGNOSES: Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging with contrast revealed a large right vulvar heterogeneously enhancing soft tissue mass measuring 13.1 × 10.9 × 10.7 cm expending the left vulva, with internal and peripheral voids resembling feeding vessels. The mass was surgically removed, and subsequent histopathology showed skin-covered dermal-based lesion composed of fibroblast-like bland and spindle cell proliferation with thin-walled blood vessels of various sizes. Immunohistostaining of CD34 and smooth muscle antigen were both positive, while desmin was found to be negative. A diagnosis of vulvar angiofibroma was made based on the clinical scenario, imaging, and histopathology.
interventionsMass vulvectomy was performed starting with a circumferential incision at the base of the mass and structural dissection to separate the mass from the vulvar wall. The incision was successfully closed, and subcuticular stitches were applied to the skin. OUTCOMES: The patient's complaints were significantly relieved with no postoperative complications and the patient is being followed regularly in an outpatient setting. LESSONS: Due to its extremely benign nature of CA, and the implausible ability of its recurrence, it was decided to surgically excise it. Despite its rarity, it can be readily identified at its earlier stages preventing the vexing and exasperating symptoms accompanied with increased size as mentioned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.