Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36086639›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2022

True location of deep brain stimulation electrodes differs from what is seen on postoperative magnetic resonance images: An anthropomorphic phantom study.

Noa B Nuzov, Bhumi Bhusal, Kaylee R Henry, Fuchang Jiang, Joshua Rosenow, Behzad Elahi, Laleh Golestanirad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Noa B Nuzov
Bhumi Bhusal
Kaylee R Henry
Fuchang Jiang
Joshua Rosenow
Behzad Elahi
Laleh Golestanirad

Funding

Reconfigurable MRI technology for safe and high-resolution imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3TR01EB030324 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established yet growing treatment for a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Over the last decade, numerous studies have underscored the effect of electrode placement on the clinical outcome of DBS. As a result, imaging is now extensively used for DBS electrode localization, even though the accuracy of different modalities in determining the true coordinates of DBS electrodes is less explored. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a gold standard method for DBS electrode localization, however, the geometrical distortion induced by the lead's artifact could limit the accuracy. In this work, we investigated to what degree the difference between the true location of the lead's tip and the location of the tip estimated from the MRI artifact varies depending on the MRI sequence parameters, acquisition plane, phase encoding direction, and the implant"s extracranial trajectory. Clinical Relevance- Results will help researchers and clinicians to estimate the true location of DBS leads and contacts from postoperative MRI scans.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingPostoperative Period

Identifiers

PMID36086639
PMCPMC10848148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.