Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36086452›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2022

Improved Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Based MR Fingerprinting with Deep Autoencoders.

Hengfa Lu, Huihui Ye, Bo Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "MR Fingerprinting for Imaging Brain Hemodynamics and Oxygenation".Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hengfa Lu
Huihui Ye
Bo Zhao

Funding

Optimized MR Fingerprinting for Rapid Volumetric Quantitative NeuroimagingR00EB027181 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ZHAO, BO · 2020 to 2022
$747k
NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB027181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance (MR) Fingerprinting is an emerging transient-state imaging paradigm, which enables the quantization of multiple MR tissue parameters in a single experiment. Balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP)-based MR Fingerprinting has excellent signal-to-noise characteristics and also allows for acquiring both tissue parameter maps and field inhomogeneity maps. However, field inhomogeneity often results in complex magnetization evolutions in bSSFP-based MR Fingerprinting, which creates significant challenges in image reconstruction. In this paper, we introduce a new method to address the image reconstruction problem. The proposed method incorporates a low-dimensional nonlinear manifold learned from an ensemble of magnetization evolutions using a deep autoencoder. It provides much better representation power than a low-dimensional linear subspace in capturing complex magnetization evolutions. We formulate the image reconstruction problem with this nonlinear model and solve the resulting optimization problem using an algorithm based on variable splitting and the alternating direction method of multipliers. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method using numerical experiments and demonstrate that it significantly outperforms the state-of-art method using a linear subspace model.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID36086452
PMCPMC9472809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.