Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085949›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2022

Investigating uncertainty in augmented reality enhanced renal navigation using in vitro patient-specific tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Peter Jackson, Kelly Merrell, Richard Simon, Cristian Linte

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Intervention planning in modern renal surgery].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter Jackson
Kelly Merrell
Richard Simon
Cristian Linte
Rochester Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Biomedical Computing and Visualization Tools for Computer-integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutic Data ScienceR35GM128877 · NIGMS · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Cristian A Linte · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the outcome of minimally invasive renal interventions, traditional video-guided needle navigation can be enhanced by tracking the needle, guiding the needle using video imaging, and augmenting the surgical scene with pre-procedural images or models of the anatomy. In our previous work we studied, both through simulations and in vitro experiments, the uncertainty associated with the model-to-phantom registration, as well as the camera-tracker calibration and video-guided navigation. In this work, we characterize the overall navigation uncertainty using tissue emulating patient-specific kidney phantoms featuring both virtual and physical internal targets. Pre-procedural models of the kidney phantoms and internal targets are generated from cone-beam CT images, and are registered to their intra-operative physical counter-parts. The user then guides the needle insertion to reach the internal targets using video-based imaging augmented with a virtual representation of the needle tracked in real time. Following navigation, we acquire post-procedural cone-beam CT images of the phantoms and inserted needles. These images are used to determine the ground truth needle navigation accuracy (i.e., needle to target distance) against which the intra-operative navigation accuracy (i.e., intra-op needle tip to target distance) is assessed. We also explore a method to update the pre-procedural model to physical phantom registration intra-operatively using tracked video imaging, with the overall goal to improve overall navigation accuracy in the event of sub-optimal initial image-to-phantom registration. Our results showed a navigation error of less than 3.5 mm in gelatin phantoms and less than 6.5 mm in PVA phantoms. Following registration correction intra-operatively, we showed an overall improvement in navigation from roughly 6 mm RMS to approximately 2 mm RMS error, which is acceptable given the inherent tracking, 3D printing and phantom manufacturing limitations.

Indexed as

Augmented RealitySurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKidneyUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID36085949
PMCPMC10158953
OpenAlexW4295508768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.