ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2022
Joint Segmentation and Uncertainty Estimation of Ventricular Structures from Cardiac MRI using a Bayesian CondenseUNet.
Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown potential in segmenting cardiac structures from magnetic resonance (MR) images, their clinical applications still fall short of providing reliable cardiac segmentation. As a result, it is critical to quantify segmentation uncertainty in order to identify which segmentations might be troublesome. Moreover, quantifying uncertainty is critical in real-world scenarios, where input distributions are frequently moved from the training distribution due to sample bias and non-stationarity. Therefore, well-calibrated uncertainty estimates provide information on whether a model's output should (or should not) be trusted in such situations. In this work, we used a Bayesian version of our previously proposed CondenseUNet [1] framework featuring both a learned group structure and a regularized weight-pruner to reduce the computational cost in volumetric image segmentation and help quantify predictive uncertainty. Our study further showcases the potential of our deep-learning framework to evaluate the correlation between the uncertainty and the segmentation errors for a given model. The proposed model was trained and tested on the Automated Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge (ACDC) dataset featuring 150 cine cardiac MRI patient dataset for the segmentation and uncertainty estimation of the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), and myocardium (Myo) at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.