Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085592›Full record

ArticleAnimal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho

Prevention of mastitis in multiparous dairy cows with a previous history of mastitis by oral feeding with probiotic Bacillus subtilis.

Megumi Urakawa, Tao Zhuang, Hidetoshi Sato, Satoru Takanashi, Kozue Yoshimura, Yuma Endo, Teppei Katsura, Tsuyoshi Umino, Koutaro Tanaka, Hitoshi Watanabe and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Akkermansia muciniphila-Derived Outer Membrane Vesicles as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Mastitis: Insights From In Vitro and Vivo Studies.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Draft genome sequences of 21Microbiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Megumi UrakawaInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0125-4016
Tao ZhuangInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1475-7138
Hidetoshi SatoMiyagi Prefectural Livestock Experiment Station, Osaki, Japan.
Satoru TakanashiInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Kozue YoshimuraInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Yuma EndoInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Teppei KatsuraInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tsuyoshi UminoInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Koutaro TanakaInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Hitoshi WatanabeLaboratory of Animal Functional Morphology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Hiroko KobayashiMiyagi Prefectural Livestock Experiment Station, Osaki, Japan.
Naokazu TakadaMiyagi Prefectural Livestock Experiment Station, Osaki, Japan.
Tomoyuki KozutsumiMiyagi Prefectural Livestock Experiment Station, Osaki, Japan.
Hiroaki KumagaiMiyagi Prefectural Livestock Experiment Station, Osaki, Japan.
Takafumi AsanoMiyagi Prefectural Livestock Experiment Station, Osaki, Japan.
Kohko SazawaMiyagi Prefectural Livestock Experiment Station, Osaki, Japan.
Nobuhisa AshidaLaboratory of Animal Health Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Guoqi ZhaoInstitute of Animal Culture Collection and Application, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Michael T RoseTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6058-1319
Haruki KitazawaInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-5553
Hitoshi ShirakawaInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Kouichi WatanabeInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tomonori NochiInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Takehiko NakamuraInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Hisashi AsoInternational Education and Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5114-4651
Tohoku University · JPTochigi Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station · JPUniversity of Tasmania · AUYangzhou University · CN

Funding

Challenging Exploratory Research 16K15021Challenging Exploratory Research 24658224Challenging Exploratory Research 26660217Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 15H04586Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 18H02326Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 21H02340Japan Racing AssociationJapan Society for the Promotion of Science: JSPSCore-to-CoreProgramThe project NARO Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institute 29006A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mastitis is a very common inflammatory disease of the mammary gland of dairy cows, resulting in a reduction of milk production and quality. Probiotics may serve as an alternative to antibiotics to prevent mastitis, and the use of probiotics in this way may lessen the risk of antibiotic resistant bacteria developing. We investigated the effect of oral feeding of probiotic Bacillus subtilis (BS) C-3102 strain on the onset of mastitis in dairy cows with a previous history of mastitis. BS feeding significantly decreased the incidence of mastitis, the average number of medication days and the average number of days when milk was discarded, and maintained the mean SCC in milk at a level substantially lower than the control group. BS feeding was associated with lower levels of cortisol and TBARS and increased the proportion of CD4

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesMastitis, BovineProbioticsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillus subtilisCattleCyclophilin AFemaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsCyclophilin ABacillus subtilis C-3102 strainbovine mastitisdairy cattleprobioticsprophylactic effect

Identifiers

PMID36085592
PMCPMC9541589
OpenAlexW4295127004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.