Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085547›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

Validating a model to detect infant crying from naturalistic audio.

Megan Micheletti, Xuewen Yao, Mckensey Johnson, Kaya de Barbaro

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. INFANT CRYING DETECTION IN REAL-WORLD ENVIRONMENTS.Proceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ICASSP (Conference) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan MichelettiDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 108 E Dean Keeton St, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. m.micheletti@utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7197-7172
Xuewen YaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Mckensey JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 108 E Dean Keeton St, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Kaya de BarbaroDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, 108 E Dean Keeton St, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6316-0085
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

High-density markers of mother-infant bio-behavioral activity "in the wild": Developing a mobile-sensing paradigm to examine transmission of mental health risksK01MH111957 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DE BARBARO, KAYA · 2017 to 2021
$473k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH111957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human infant crying evolved as a signal to elicit parental care and actively influences caregiving behaviors as well as infant-caregiver interactions. Automated cry detection algorithms have become more popular in recent decades, and while some models exist, they have not been evaluated thoroughly on daylong naturalistic audio recordings. Here, we validate a novel deep learning cry detection model by testing it in assessment scenarios important to developmental researchers. We also evaluate the deep learning model's performance relative to LENA's cry classifier, one of the most commonly used commercial software systems for quantifying child crying. Broadly, we found that both deep learning and LENA model outputs showed convergent validity with human annotations of infant crying. However, the deep learning model had substantially higher accuracy metrics (recall, F1, kappa) and stronger correlations with human annotations at all timescales tested (24 h, 1 h, and 5 min) relative to LENA. On average, LENA underestimated infant crying by 50 min every 24 h relative to human annotations and the deep learning model. Additionally, daily infant crying times detected by both automated models were lower than parent-report estimates in the literature. We provide recommendations and solutions for leveraging automated algorithms to detect infant crying in the home and make our training data and model code open source and publicly available.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCryingHumansInfantParentsSoftwareComputational modelDeep learningInfant cryingNaturalistic

Identifiers

PMID36085547
PMCPMC9995596
OpenAlexW4295047952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.