Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085546›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

Sequential dependencies of responses in a questionnaire survey and their effects on the reliability and validity of measurement.

Daisuke Shimada, Kentaro Katahira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daisuke ShimadaDepartment of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Kentaro KatahiraDepartment of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. k.katahira@aist.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reliability and validity of measurements in questionnaire surveys are affected by the survey design. Previous studies have discussed whether the items on a multidimensional scale should be grouped by subscale or randomized to increase the reliability and validity of the measurement. However, it is not clear what effect item order has on the true reliability and validity and whether the order causes bias in these estimates. Furthermore, it is not clear whether there are sequential dependencies of responses, which refers to the effect of past responses on current responses and, if so, what effects that they have on reliability, coefficient α, and validity. Study 1 empirically revealed that each respondent's previous response had a positive effect on his or her current response. In Study 2, we conducted a theoretical investigation and found that the first-order positive sequential dependencies of responses reduced the reliability, coefficient α, and validity of the subscales. In addition, sequential dependencies were found to render these indicators higher when the items were grouped than when they were randomized and caused an overestimation of reliability by coefficient α. Study 3 confirmed the effects of sequential dependencies and item order on coefficient α using real data. Thus, this study showed the potential impact of sequential dependencies of responses on psychological measurements.

Indexed as

Reproducibility of ResultsFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesQuestionnaire surveyReliabilitySequential dependenciesValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.