ArticleBehavior research methods2023
Sequential dependencies of responses in a questionnaire survey and their effects on the reliability and validity of measurement.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The implementation of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a qualitative study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- The second victim phenomenon in Japan: prevalence, impact, and associated factors- the JaSeVic study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Modeling Sequential Dependencies in Progressive Matrices: An Auto-Regressive Item Response Theory (AR-IRT) Approach.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reliability and validity of measurements in questionnaire surveys are affected by the survey design. Previous studies have discussed whether the items on a multidimensional scale should be grouped by subscale or randomized to increase the reliability and validity of the measurement. However, it is not clear what effect item order has on the true reliability and validity and whether the order causes bias in these estimates. Furthermore, it is not clear whether there are sequential dependencies of responses, which refers to the effect of past responses on current responses and, if so, what effects that they have on reliability, coefficient α, and validity. Study 1 empirically revealed that each respondent's previous response had a positive effect on his or her current response. In Study 2, we conducted a theoretical investigation and found that the first-order positive sequential dependencies of responses reduced the reliability, coefficient α, and validity of the subscales. In addition, sequential dependencies were found to render these indicators higher when the items were grouped than when they were randomized and caused an overestimation of reliability by coefficient α. Study 3 confirmed the effects of sequential dependencies and item order on coefficient α using real data. Thus, this study showed the potential impact of sequential dependencies of responses on psychological measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36085546What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.