Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085533›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Panels of circulating microRNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thu H N Nguyen, Thanh T N Nguyen, Tran T M Nguyen, Le H M Nguyen, Luan H Huynh, Hoang N Phan, Hue T Nguyen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thu H N NguyenVietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-7608
Thanh T N NguyenDepartment of Physiology and Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.
Tran T M NguyenDepartment of Physiology and Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.
Le H M NguyenVietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.
Luan H HuynhDepartment of Physiology and Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.
Hoang N PhanDepartment of Physiology and Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam.
Hue T NguyenDepartment of Physiology and Animal Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, 70000, Vietnam. nthue@hcmus.edu.vn.

Funding

Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City 562- 2020-18-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCirculating microRNAs (miRNAs) are potential diagnostic biomarkers for breast cancer (BC). The application of miRNA panels could improve the performance of screening tests. Here, we integrated bioinformatic tools and meta-analyses to select circulating miRNAs with high diagnostic accuracy and combined these markers to develop diagnostic panels for BC.

methodsAnalyses across databases were performed to identify potential BC-related circulating miRNAs. Next, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted for each miRNA following the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic and manual search for relevant literature was carried out by two reviewers through PubMed, ScienceDirect, Biomed Central, and Google Scholar. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2, and the statistical analyses were performed using R software 4.1.1. Finally, the accurate biomarkers confirmed through meta-analyses were combined into diagnostic models for BC.

resultsTwenty-seven circulating miRNAs were identified as BC-related by bioinformatic tools. After screening, only 10 miRNAs presented in 45 studies were eligible for meta-analyses. By assessing pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio, 8 miRNAs (miR-21, miR-30b, miR-125b, miR-145, miR221 miR-222, and miR-335) were revealed as promising BC diagnostic biomarkers. Two panels constructed from these miRNAs showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for BC, with areas under the SROC curve of 0.917 and 0.944.

conclusionWe identified 8 potential circulating miRNAs and 2 diagnostic models that are useful for diagnosing BC. However, the established miRNA panels have not been tested in any experimental studies and thus should be validated in large case-control studies for clinical use.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCirculating MicroRNAMicroRNAsBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansOdds RatioBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNAMicroRNAsMIRN145 microRNA, humanBreast cancerCirculatingDiagnosisMeta-analysismiRNA

Identifiers

PMID36085533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.