Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085324›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Traject3d allows label-free identification of distinct co-occurring phenotypes within 3D culture by live imaging.

Eva C Freckmann, Emma Sandilands, Erin Cumming, Matthew Neilson, Alvaro Román-Fernández, Konstantina Nikolatou, Marisa Nacke, Tamsin R M Lannagan, Ann Hedley, David Strachan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Live-cell imaging in the deep learning era.Current opinion in cell biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Eva C Freckmann *Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7880-180X
Emma Sandilands *Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6829-0911
Erin CummingInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.
Matthew NeilsonThe CRUK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom.
Alvaro Román-FernándezInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5032-3460
Konstantina NikolatouInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5626-3390
Marisa NackeInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.
Tamsin R M LannaganThe CRUK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom.
Ann HedleyThe CRUK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2090-8206
David StrachanThe CRUK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom.
Mark SaljiThe CRUK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom.
Jennifer P MortonInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.
Lynn McGarryThe CRUK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, G61 1BD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7055-2615
Hing Y LeungInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3933-3975
Owen J SansomInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9540-3010
Crispin J MillerInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4341-1283
David M BryantInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1HQ, United Kingdom. david.bryant@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2721-5012

Funding

ARF GTPase regulation of prostate tumorigenesis: spheroid and in vivo approachesK99CA163535 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BRYANT, DAVID MICHAEL · 2012 to 2013
$326k
Cancer Research UK 29801Cancer Research UK 29996Cancer Research UK A22904Cancer Research UK A25233Cancer Research UK A26825Cancer Research UK A28223Cancer Research UK A29801Cancer Research UK A29996Cancer Research UK A31287Cancer Research UK C596/A17196Cancer Research UK C596/A19481Cancer Research UK C7932/A25170Medical Research Council MR/L017997/1Medical Research Council MR/T040769/1NCI NIH HHS K99 CA163535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single cell profiling by genetic, proteomic and imaging methods has expanded the ability to identify programmes regulating distinct cell states. The 3-dimensional (3D) culture of cells or tissue fragments provides a system to study how such states contribute to multicellular morphogenesis. Whether cells plated into 3D cultures give rise to a singular phenotype or whether multiple biologically distinct phenotypes arise in parallel is largely unknown due to a lack of tools to detect such heterogeneity. Here we develop Traject3d (Trajectory identification in 3D), a method for identifying heterogeneous states in 3D culture and how these give rise to distinct phenotypes over time, from label-free multi-day time-lapse imaging. We use this to characterise the temporal landscape of morphological states of cancer cell lines, varying in metastatic potential and drug resistance, and use this information to identify drug combinations that inhibit such heterogeneity. Traject3d is therefore an important companion to other single-cell technologies by facilitating real-time identification via live imaging of how distinct states can lead to alternate phenotypes that occur in parallel in 3D culture.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProteomicsDiagnostic ImagingHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID36085324
PMCPMC9463449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.