Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085280›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Quantum nonlinear spectroscopy of single nuclear spins.

Jonas Meinel, Vadim Vorobyov, Ping Wang, Boris Yavkin, Mathias Pfender, Hitoshi Sumiya, Shinobu Onoda, Junichi Isoya, Ren-Bao Liu, J Wrachtrup

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Photoelectron spectroscopy with entangled photons; enhanced spectrotemporal resolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jonas Meinel *3rd Institute of Physics, Research Center SCoPE and IQST, University of Stuttgart, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4040-8361
Vadim Vorobyov *3rd Institute of Physics, Research Center SCoPE and IQST, University of Stuttgart, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6784-4932
Ping Wang *Department of Physics, Centre for Quantum Coherence, and Hong Kong Institute of Quantum Information Science and Technology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.
Boris Yavkin3rd Institute of Physics, Research Center SCoPE and IQST, University of Stuttgart, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.
Mathias Pfender3rd Institute of Physics, Research Center SCoPE and IQST, University of Stuttgart, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3934-8306
Hitoshi SumiyaSumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd., Itami, 664-0016, Japan.
Shinobu OnodaTakasaki Advanced Radiation Research Institute, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Takasaki, 370-1292, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-0708
Junichi IsoyaFaculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, 305-8573, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9598-625X
Ren-Bao LiuDepartment of Physics, Centre for Quantum Coherence, and Hong Kong Institute of Quantum Information Science and Technology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China. rbliu@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0620-2370
J Wrachtrup3rd Institute of Physics, Research Center SCoPE and IQST, University of Stuttgart, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany. wrachtrup@physik.uni-stuttgart.de.
University of Stuttgart · DEChinese University of Hong Kong · HKNational Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology · JPSumitomo Electric Industries (Japan) · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) SPP1601, FOR2724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional nonlinear spectroscopy, which use classical probes, can only access a limited set of correlations in a quantum system. Here we demonstrate that quantum nonlinear spectroscopy, in which a quantum sensor and a quantum object are first entangled and the sensor is measured along a chosen basis, can extract arbitrary types and orders of correlations in a quantum system. We measured fourth-order correlations of single nuclear spins that cannot be measured in conventional nonlinear spectroscopy, using sequential weak measurement via a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. The quantum nonlinear spectroscopy provides fingerprint features to identify different types of objects, such as Gaussian noises, random-phased AC fields, and quantum spins, which would be indistinguishable in second-order correlations. This work constitutes an initial step toward the application of higher-order correlations to quantum sensing, to examining the quantum foundation (by, e.g., higher-order Leggett-Garg inequality), and to studying quantum many-body physics.

Identifiers

PMID36085280
PMCPMC9463177
OpenAlexW3200828250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.