Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085251›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2022

Pediatric Clinical Research Networks: Role in Accelerating Development of Therapeutics in Children.

Rachel G Greenberg, Susan McCune, Sabah Attar, Collin Hovinga, Breanne Stewart, Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Innovation and Opportunities in Pediatric Therapeutic Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Rachel G GreenbergDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA. rachel.greenberg@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-8543
Susan McCuneRare Diseases and Pediatrics Center of Excellence, PPD, Part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sabah AttarDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Collin HovingaInstitute for Advanced Clinical Trials for Children, Rockville, MD, USA.
Breanne StewartQuality Management in Clinical Research (QMCR), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Thierry Lacaze-MasmonteilDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
AIDS Clinical Trials Group · USDuke University · USThermo Fisher Scientific (United States) · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

I-ACT for Children, Global Pediatric Clinical Trials NetworkU18FD006297 · FDA · INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CLINICAL TRIALS FOR CHILDREN, INC. · PI FORREST, CHRISTOPHER B, HOVINGA, COLLIN · 2017 to 2021
$5.0M
CIHRFDA HHS U18 FD006297FDA HHS U18 FD006297-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent decades have seen many advances in policy and legislation that support the development of drugs used by neonates, infants, children, and young people. This review summarizes the characteristics and performance of networks capable of conducting studies needed to meet regulatory requirements and make advances in pediatric drug development.

methodsDescription of network goals and capabilities by network leaders.

resultsIn the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada, clinical research networks have been organized to meet the needs of biopharmaceutical and academic sponsors for timely access to high-quality sites, as well as to provide advice about drug development with regard to strategic and operational feasibility. Each network addresses the specificities of its context while working toward shared principles including standards and timelines; alignment of goals and processes, while not disturbing arrangements for conducting trials that work well; wide geographic coverage; all age groups and pediatric conditions; sources of funding; sites that compete on performance; performance monitoring for benchmarking, and opportunities to optimize the allocation of resources; and education and training for network members. Facilitation in interactions among these networks is based on a single point-of-contact for each; similar approaches to strategic and operational feasibility assessment, and site selection; and collaborative approaches to education and training.

conclusionWithin five years, clinical research networks will support the needs of biopharmaceutical and publicly funded pediatric drug development through locally appropriate and globally interoperable approaches.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsAdolescentCanadaChildEuropeHumansInfant, NewbornJapanUnited StatesBiological ProductsDrug developmentInfrastructurePediatricsResearch networks

Identifiers

PMID36085251
PMCPMC9462608
OpenAlexW4295066965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.