ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2022
Pediatric Clinical Research Networks: Role in Accelerating Development of Therapeutics in Children.
Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics, accessibility and regional equity evaluation of pediatric medicines through National Drug Price Negotiation of China, 2017-2024.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Developing a National Network for Leukodystrophy Research and Care in Canada: The CARELeuko Initiative.Neurology. Genetics · 2025Review
- Children's drug research and development incentives and market pricing optimization based on medical imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The route to financial sustainability of a large Public Private Partnership-the example of the clinical trial network conect4children (c4c).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Requirements and special considerations for drug trials with children across six jurisdictions: 1. Clinical trial application review in the regulatory approval process.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Harmonizing Quality Improvement Metrics Across Global Trial Networks to Advance Paediatric Clinical Trials Delivery.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
- Conducting Drug Treatment Trials in Children: Opportunities and Challenges.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical Trials for Special Populations: Children, Older Adults, and Rare Diseases.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2024Review
- Partnership of I-ACT for children (US) and European pediatric clinical trial networks to facilitate pediatric clinical trials.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Strengthening research networks: Insights from a clinical research network in Brazil.PloS one · 2024Article
- Off-Label Prescribing in Pediatric Population-Literature Review for 2012-2022.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Development and performance of the c4c national clinical trial networks for optimizing pediatric trial facilitation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Accelerating Pediatric Drug Development: A 2022 Special Issue of Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022Article
- Innovation and Opportunities in Pediatric Therapeutic Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent decades have seen many advances in policy and legislation that support the development of drugs used by neonates, infants, children, and young people. This review summarizes the characteristics and performance of networks capable of conducting studies needed to meet regulatory requirements and make advances in pediatric drug development.
methodsDescription of network goals and capabilities by network leaders.
resultsIn the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada, clinical research networks have been organized to meet the needs of biopharmaceutical and academic sponsors for timely access to high-quality sites, as well as to provide advice about drug development with regard to strategic and operational feasibility. Each network addresses the specificities of its context while working toward shared principles including standards and timelines; alignment of goals and processes, while not disturbing arrangements for conducting trials that work well; wide geographic coverage; all age groups and pediatric conditions; sources of funding; sites that compete on performance; performance monitoring for benchmarking, and opportunities to optimize the allocation of resources; and education and training for network members. Facilitation in interactions among these networks is based on a single point-of-contact for each; similar approaches to strategic and operational feasibility assessment, and site selection; and collaborative approaches to education and training.
conclusionWithin five years, clinical research networks will support the needs of biopharmaceutical and publicly funded pediatric drug development through locally appropriate and globally interoperable approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.