Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085238›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2022

Assessing the health impacts of transnational corporations: a case study of Carlton and United Breweries in Australia.

Julia Anaf, Fran Baum, Matt Fisher, Fiona Haigh, Emma Miller, Hailay Gesesew, Nicholas Freudenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bibliometric Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Community Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia AnafStretton Health Equity, Stretton Institute, North Tce Campus, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia. julia.anaf@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9562-2309
Fran BaumStretton Health Equity, Stretton Institute, North Tce Campus, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
Matt FisherStretton Health Equity, Stretton Institute, North Tce Campus, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
Fiona HaighHealth Equity Research Development Unit *HERDU, UNSW Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity (CPHCE), University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Emma MillerCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001.
Hailay GesesewTorrens University Australia, 88 Wakefield St, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000.
Nicholas FreudenbergGraduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, USA.
The University of Adelaide · AUCity University of New York · USFlinders University · AUTorrens University Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe practices of transnational corporations (TNCs) affect population health through unhealthy products, shaping social determinants of health, or influencing the regulatory structures governing their activities. There has been limited research on community exposures to TNC policies and practices. The aim of this paper was to adapt existing Health Impact Assessment methods that were previously used for both a fast food and an extractives industry corporation in order to assess Carlton and United Breweries (CUB) operations within Australia. CUB is an Australian alcohol company owned by a large transnational corporation Asahi Group Holdings. Data identifying potential impacts were sourced through document analysis, including corporate literature; media analysis, and 12 semi-structured interviews. The data were mapped against a corporate health impact assessment framework which included CUB's political and business practices; products and marketing; workforce, social, environmental and economic conditions; and consumers' adverse health impacts. We also conducted an ecological study for estimating alcohol attributable fractions and burdens of death due to congestive heart disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, breast cancer, bowel cancer and injury in Australia. Beer attributable fractions and deaths and CUB's share were also estimated.

resultsWe found both positive and adverse findings of the corporation's operations across all domains. CUB engage in a range of business practices which benefit the community, including sustainability goals and corporate philanthropy, but also negative aspects including from taxation arrangements, marketing practices, and political donations and lobbying which are enabled by a neoliberal regulatory environment. We found adverse health impacts including from fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and violence and aggression which disproportionately affect Indigenous and other disadvantaged populations.

conclusionOur research indicates that studying a TNC in a rapidly changing global financialised capitalist economy in a world which is increasingly being managed by TNCs poses methodological and conceptual challenges. It highlights the need and opportunity for future research. The different methods revealed sufficient information to recognise that strong regulatory frameworks are needed to help to avoid or to mediate negative health impacts.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOrganizationsAustraliaCommerceFemaleHumansMarketingAlcohol industryGlobalizationHealth equityTransnational corporations

Identifiers

PMID36085238
PMCPMC9462641
OpenAlexW4295066788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.