ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022
The role of exome sequencing in childhood interstitial or diffuse lung disease.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of ILNEB: Absence of classic dermatologic findings in a 12-year-old girl with homozygous ITGA3 p.Arg274Gln.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- Childhood Interstitial Lung Disease-Successful Application of a Stepwise Diagnostic Classification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Mastering genetics for your clinic: A step-by-step guide.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Why some and not others? Understanding vascular phenotypes in genetic developmental lung diseases.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Genetic Testing Utilization in the U.S. Registry for Childhood Interstitial and Diffuse Lung Diseases.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Observational
- Innovations in Childhood Interstitial and Diffuse Lung Disease.Clinics in chest medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical and research innovations in childhood interstitial lung disease (chILD).Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Article
- Clinical scope and healthcare utilization in childhood interstitial lung disease at a tertiary center.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Article
- Clinical and functional heterogeneity associated with the disruption of retinoic acid receptor beta.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- Australian Genomics: Outcomes of a 5-year national program to accelerate the integration of genomics in healthcare.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren's interstitial and diffuse lung disease (chILD) is a complex heterogeneous group of lung disorders. Gene panel approaches have a reported diagnostic yield of ~ 12%. No data currently exist using trio exome sequencing as the standard diagnostic modality. We assessed the diagnostic utility of using trio exome sequencing in chILD. We prospectively enrolled children meeting specified clinical criteria between 2016 and 2020 from 16 Australian hospitals. Exome sequencing was performed with analysis of an initial gene panel followed by trio exome analysis. A subset of critically ill infants underwent ultra-rapid trio exome sequencing as first-line test.
results36 patients [median (range) age 0.34 years (0.02-11.46); 11F] were recruited from multiple States and Territories. Five patients had clinically significant likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants (RARB, RPL15, CTCF, RFXANK, TBX4) and one patient had a variant of uncertain significance (VIP) suspected to contribute to their clinical phenotype, with VIP being a novel gene candidate.
conclusionsTrio exomes (6/36; 16.7%) had a better diagnostic rate than gene panel (1/36; 2.8%), due to the ability to consider a broader range of underlying conditions. However, the aetiology of chILD in most cases remained undetermined, likely reflecting the interplay between low penetrant genetic and environmental factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.