Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085089›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2022

Inhospital cardiac arrest - the crucial first 5 min: a simulation study.

Mathilde Stærk, Kasper G Lauridsen, Camilla Thomsen Støtt, Dung Nguyen Riis, Bo Løfgren, Kristian Krogh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathilde StærkDepartment of Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Kasper G LauridsenResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Camilla Thomsen StøttDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Regional Hospital Horsens, Horsens, Denmark.
Dung Nguyen RiisResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bo LøfgrenDepartment of Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Kristian KroghResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. krogh@clin.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8490-1150
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAarhus University · DKChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USRegional Hospital Horsens · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DK

Funding

Fonden til Lægevidenskabens Fremme 17-L-0068Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region R64-A3268Helsefonden 18-B-0017Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine 3338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly recognition and call for help, fast initiation of chest compressions, and early defibrillation are key elements to improve survival after cardiac arrest but are often not achieved. We aimed to investigate what occurs during the initial treatment of unannounced in situ simulated inhospital cardiac arrests and reasons for successful or inadequate initial resuscitation efforts.

methodsWe conducted unannounced full-scale in situ simulated inhospital cardiac arrest followed by a debriefing. Simulations and debriefings were video recorded for subsequent analysis. We analyzed quantitative data on actions performed and time measurements to key actions from simulations and qualitative data from transcribed debriefings.

resultsWe conducted 36 simulations. Time to diagnosis of cardiac arrest was 37 (27; 55) s. Time to first chest compression from diagnosis of cardiac arrest was 37 (18; 74) s, time to calling the cardiac arrest team was 144 (71; 180) s, and time to first shock was 221 (181; 301) s. We observed participants perform several actions after diagnosing the cardiac arrest and before initiating chest compressions. Domains emerging from the debriefings were teaming and resources. Teaming included the themes communication, role allocation, leadership, and shared knowledge, which all included facilitators and barriers. Resources included the themes knowledge, technical issues, and organizational resources, of which all included barriers, and knowledge also included facilitators.

conclusionUsing unannounced in situ simulated cardiac arrests, we found that key elements such as chest compressions, calling the cardiac arrest team, and defibrillation were delayed. Perceived barriers to resuscitation performance were leadership and teaming, whereas experience, clear leadership, and recent training were perceived as important facilitators for treatment progress.

Indexed as

Basic life supportInhospital cardiac arrestIn situ simulation

Identifiers

PMID36085089
PMCPMC9462625
OpenAlexW4295047916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.