Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085079›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

Positional motif analysis reveals the extent of specificity of protein-RNA interactions observed by CLIP.

Klara Kuret, Aram Gustav Amalietti, D Marc Jones, Charlotte Capitanchik, Jernej Ule

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Meta-unstable mRNAs in activated CD8Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Klara KuretNational Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aram Gustav AmaliettiNational Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
D Marc JonesThe Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Charlotte CapitanchikThe Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Jernej UleNational Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. jernej.ule@ki.si.ORCID 0000-0002-2452-4277

Funding

Medical Research Council FC001110Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 215593/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) is a method used to identify in vivo RNA-protein binding sites on a transcriptome-wide scale. With the increasing amounts of available data for RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), it is important to understand to what degree the enriched motifs specify the RNA-binding profiles of RBPs in cells.

resultsWe develop positionally enriched k-mer analysis (PEKA), a computational tool for efficient analysis of enriched motifs from individual CLIP datasets, which minimizes the impact of technical and regional genomic biases by internal data normalization. We cross-validate PEKA with mCross and show that the use of input control for background correction is not required to yield high specificity of enriched motifs. We identify motif classes with common enrichment patterns across eCLIP datasets and across RNA regions, while also observing variations in the specificity and the extent of motif enrichment across eCLIP datasets, between variant CLIP protocols, and between CLIP and in vitro binding data. Thereby, we gain insights into the contributions of technical and regional genomic biases to the enriched motifs, and find how motif enrichment features relate to the domain composition and low-complexity regions of the studied proteins.

conclusionsOur study provides insights into the overall contributions of regional binding preferences, protein domains, and low-complexity regions to the specificity of protein-RNA interactions, and shows the value of cross-motif and cross-RBP comparison for data interpretation. Our results are presented for exploratory analysis via an online platform in an RBP-centric and motif-centric manner ( https://imaps.goodwright.com/apps/peka/ ).

Indexed as

GenomicsRNABinding SitesImmunoprecipitationProtein DomainsRNACLIPk-merLow-complexity regionProtein-RNA interactionRNA-binding proteinRNA-binding specificityRNA motif

Identifiers

PMID36085079
PMCPMC9461102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.