ArticleHereditas2022
Association of novel MUC16, MAP3K15 and ABCA1 mutation with giant congenital melanocytic nevus.
Article in Hereditas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN) is the benign nevomelanocytic proliferation. Mutations in NRAS have been previously detected in GCMN, but mutations in BRAF are generally lacking in the Chinese population. Mutated genes in this disease can estimate the risk of malignant transformation in GCMN. Therefore, it is worth investigating the genetic information of GCMN.
methodsHere, we presented two cases of GCMN of the upper extremities. The clinical and histological data were analyzed. The whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed to investigate the mutational profile of peripheral venous blood (PB), normal skin (NS), small melanocytic nevus (SMN), deep penetrating and non-penetrating GCMN (dPGCMN and nPGCMN).
resultsWe showed a reduction in the circumference of involved upper extremities in both patients. The clinical and histopathological data indicated the reduction of adipose tissue associated with the invasion of GCMN. The WES data revealed that MUC16, MAP3K15 and ABCA1 were novel potential candidate genes for the disease as well as biomarkers for predicting malignant transformation.
conclusionThe MUC16, MAP3K15 and ABCA1 may serve as novel biomarkers for predicting malignant transformation and targets for the diagnoses and therapy for the GCMN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.