Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36085038›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Construction of machine learning tools to predict threatened miscarriage in the first trimester based on AEA, progesterone and β-hCG in China: a multicentre, observational, case-control study.

Jingying Huang, Ping Lv, Yunzhi Lian, Meihua Zhang, Xin Ge, Shuheng Li, Yingxia Pan, Jiangman Zhao, Yue Xu, Hui Tang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jingying Huang *Department of Gynaecology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Ping Lv *Department of Obstetrics, Jincheng People's Hospital, Jincheng, 048000, Shanxi, China.
Yunzhi Lian *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Jincheng People's Hospital, Jincheng, 048000, Shanxi, China.
Meihua ZhangDepartment of Medical Image, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital Affiliated to Jining Medical University, Tengzhou, 277500, Shandong, China.
Xin GeDepartment of Pharmacy, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital Affiliated to Jining Medical University, Tengzhou, 277500, Shandong, China.
Shuheng LiDepartment of Thyroid &Mammary, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital Affiliated to Jining Medical University, Tengzhou, 277500, Shandong, China.
Yingxia PanShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, No. 180 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201204, China.
Jiangman ZhaoShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, No. 180 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201204, China.
Yue XuShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, No. 180 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201204, China.
Hui TangShanghai Biotecan Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, No. 180 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201204, China. tang11_23@126.com.
Nan LiDepartment of Gynaecology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital Affiliated to Jining Medical University, Tengzhou, 277500, Shandong, China. cklinan2016@126.com.
Zhishan ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China. 554882707@qq.com.
Fujian Medical University · CNJining Medical University · CNTengzhou Central People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndocannabinoid anandamide (AEA), progesterone (P4) and β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) are associated with the threatened miscarriage in the early stage. However, no study has investigated whether combing these three hormones could predict threatened miscarriage. Thus, we aim to establish machine learning models utilizing these three hormones to predict threatened miscarriage risk.

methodsThis is a multicentre, observational, case-control study involving 215 pregnant women. We recruited 119 normal pregnant women and 96 threatened miscarriage pregnant women including 58 women with ongoing pregnancy and 38 women with inevitable miscarriage. P4 and β-hCG levels were detected by chemiluminescence immunoassay assay. The level of AEA was tested by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Six predictive machine learning models were established and evaluated by the confusion matrix, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy and precision.

resultsThe median concentration of AEA was significantly lower in the healthy pregnant women group than that in the threatened miscarriage group, while the median concentration of P4 was significantly higher in the normal pregnancy group than that in the threatened miscarriage group. Only the median level of P4 was significantly lower in the inevitable miscarriage group than that in the ongoing pregnancy group. Moreover, AEA is strongly positively correlated with threatened miscarriage, while P4 is negatively correlated with both threatened miscarriage and inevitable miscarriage. Interestingly, AEA and P4 are negatively correlated with each other. Among six models, logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models obtained the AUC values of 0.75, 0.70 and 0.70, respectively; and their accuracy and precision were all above 0.60. Among these three models, the LR model showed the highest accuracy (0.65) and precision (0.70) to predict threatened miscarriage.

conclusionsThe LR model showed the highest overall predictive power, thus machine learning combined with the level of AEA, P4 and β-hCG might be a new approach to predict the threatened miscarriage risk in the near feature.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAbortion, ThreatenedCase-Control StudiesChorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, HumanFemaleHormonesHumansMachine LearningPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstProgesteroneChorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, HumanHormonesProgesteroneEndocannabinoid anandamideProgesteroneThreatened miscarriageβ-Human chorionic gonadotrophin

Identifiers

PMID36085038
PMCPMC9461209
OpenAlexW4295210879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.