Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36084900›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2024

Syndrome-Specific Neuroanatomical Phenotypes in Girls With Turner and Noonan Syndromes.

Monica Siqueiros-Sanchez, Bhavana Rai, Samir Chowdhury, Allan L Reiss, Tamar Green

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Brain volumes in fetuses with congenital heart disease and placental vascular abnormalities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influences of RASopathies on Neuroanatomical Variation in Children.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monica Siqueiros-SanchezBrain Imaging, Development and Genetics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Division of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Bhavana RaiBrain Imaging, Development and Genetics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Division of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Samir ChowdhuryDivision of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Brain Dynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Allan L ReissDivision of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Tamar GreenBrain Imaging, Development and Genetics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Division of Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: tgreen2@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Gene, Brain and Behavior in Turner SyndromeR01HD049653 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 2006 to 2016
$6.0M
Gaining insights: the effects of the RMK gain-of-function mutations on brain development and neurodevelopmental disordersR01HD108684 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Tamar Green · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
Ras/MAPK Mutations Effects on the Developing BrainK23HD090209 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, TAMAR · 2018 to 2022
$837k
Brain Development & Sex Chromosomes: Imaging of Turner and Klinefelter SyndromesR21MH099630 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 2013 to 2014
$432k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD090209NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049653NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD108684NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH099630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTurner syndrome (TS) and Noonan syndrome (NS) are distinct genetic conditions with highly similar physical and neurodevelopmental phenotypes. TS is caused by X chromosome absence, whereas NS results from genetic mutations activating the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Previous neuroimaging studies in individuals with TS and NS have shown neuroanatomical variations relative to typically developing individuals, a standard comparison group when initially examining a clinical group of interest. However, none of these studies included a second clinical comparison group, limiting their ability to identify syndrome-specific neuroanatomical phenotypes.

methodsIn this study, we compared the behavioral and brain phenotypes of 37 girls with TS, 26 girls with NS, and 37 typically developing girls, all ages 5 to 12 years, using univariate and multivariate data-driven analyses.

resultsWe found divergent neuroanatomical phenotypes between groups, despite high behavioral similarities. Relative to the typically developing group, TS was associated with smaller whole-brain cortical surface area (p ≤ .0001), whereas NS was associated with smaller whole-brain cortical thickness (p = .013). TS was associated with larger subcortical volumes (left amygdala, p = .002; right hippocampus, p = .002), whereas NS was associated with smaller subcortical volumes (bilateral caudate, p ≤ .003; putamen, p < .001; pallidum, p < .001; right hippocampus, p = .015). Multivariate analyses also showed diverging brain phenotypes in terms of surface area and cortical thickness, with surface area outperforming cortical thickness at group separation.

conclusionsTS and NS have syndrome-specific brain phenotypes, despite their behavioral similarities. Our observations suggest that neuroanatomical phenotypes better reflect the different genetic etiologies of TS and NS and may be superior biomarkers relative to behavioral phenotypes.

Indexed as

Noonan SyndromeTurner SyndromeBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhenotypeNeuroanatomyNeuroimagingNoonan syndromeRASopathiesSocial skillsTurner syndrome

Identifiers

PMID36084900
PMCPMC10305746
OpenAlexW4296311342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.