Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36084858›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2022

High-resolution atlasing and segmentation of the subcortex: Review and perspective on challenges and opportunities created by machine learning.

Adrià Casamitjana, Juan Eugenio Iglesias

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adrià CasamitjanaCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK. Electronic address: a.casamitjana@ucl.ac.uk.
Juan Eugenio IglesiasCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, USA.

Funding

Diagnosing the undiagnosable: studies of Alzheimer disease mimics and confounders via "neuropathometry" of dissection photos with 3D scanningR01AG070988 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI IGLESIAS GONZALEZ, JUAN EUGENIO · 2021 to 2025
$2.7M
Open-source software for multi-scale mapping of the human brainRF1MH123195 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FISCHL, BRUCE, IGLESIAS GONZALEZ, JUAN EUGENIO · 2020 to 2020
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070988NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH123195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews almost three decades of work on atlasing and segmentation methods for subcortical structures in human brain MRI. In writing this survey, we have three distinct aims. First, to document the evolution of digital subcortical atlases of the human brain, from the early MRI templates published in the nineties, to the complex multi-modal atlases at the subregion level that are available today. Second, to provide a detailed record of related efforts in the automated segmentation front, from earlier atlas-based methods to modern machine learning approaches. And third, to present a perspective on the future of high-resolution atlasing and segmentation of subcortical structures in in vivo human brain MRI, including open challenges and opportunities created by recent developments in machine learning.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingForecastingHumansMachine LearningSurveys and QuestionnairesAtlasMachine learningMRISegmentationSubcortexSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36084858
PMCPMC11534291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.