Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36084006›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

The preventive and therapeutic effects of probiotics on mastitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qinghong Yu, Chuchu Xu, Mengqian Wang, Jiayan Zhu, Linghong Yu, Zimei Yang, Shan Liu, Xiufei Gao

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Probiotic Characterization ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Shaping Microbiota During the First 1000 Days of Life.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qinghong YuFirst Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chuchu XuFirst Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Mengqian WangFirst Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiayan ZhuFirst Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Linghong YuFirst Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zimei YangFirst Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shan LiuFirst Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiufei GaoFirst Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-7920
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute mastitis is one of the main reasons why breastfeeding women stop breastfeeding, and medication should be used with caution. Considering the uncertainty of mastitis infection and the indications of antibiotic use, as well as the problem of drug resistance and the safety of medication during lactation, probiotics have become an alternative treatment choice. However, a meta-analysis of the effects of probiotics in preventing and treating lactational mastitis is still lacking. Therefore, we searched six electronic databases and the sites of clinical trial registration, a total of six randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis, which showed that oral probiotics during pregnancy can reduce the incidence of mastitis (RR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.69; p<0.0001). After oral administration of probiotics, the counts of bacteria in the milk of healthy people and mastitis patients were both significantly reduced (in healthy people: MD: -0.19, 95% CI: -0.23 to -0.16, p<0.00001; in mastitis patients: MD: -0.89, 95% CI: -1.34 to -0.43, p = 0.0001). These indicate that to a certain extent, probiotics are beneficial in reducing the incidence rate of mastitis during lactation and some related mastitis symptoms. However, high-quality multicenter clinical trials are still needed to support this result.

Indexed as

MastitisProbioticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBreast FeedingFemaleHumansLactationMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID36084006
PMCPMC9462749
OpenAlexW4295030633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.