Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36083773›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2022

The use of an endoscopic endonasal approach for a secondary intraorbital meningioma: illustrative case.

Breno W M Guedes, Joilson F de Souza Júnior, Nelson A D'Avila Melo, João M B de Menezes Neto, André Beer-Furlan, Arthur M P Oliveira

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Breno W M GuedesDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Joilson F de Souza Júnior2Department of Medicine, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil; and.
Nelson A D'Avila Melo3Otolaryngology, Hospital of Surgery Charitable Foundation, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.
João M B de Menezes Neto3Otolaryngology, Hospital of Surgery Charitable Foundation, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.
André Beer-Furlan4Department of Neurosurgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Arthur M P OliveiraDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeningiomas are the most frequent primary tumors in the central nervous system (CNS), but intraorbital location is uncommon and accounts for only 0.2% to 4% of all CNS meningiomas. Lesions in this compartment could be classified as primary, secondary, or ectopic. The close relationship with the optic nerve sheath is a landmark to identify the tumor as primary, whereas secondary tumors commonly come from an extension of an intracranial meningioma, and ectopic meningioma is a concept not yet completely established. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present a rare case of a secondary intraorbital meningioma operated through an endoscopic endonasal approach. Secondary meningiomas at the medial orbit are very uncommon, given their more common superior and lateral location as an extension of sphenoid meningiomas. The endoscopic endonasal route provides direct access to the medial orbit. The authors present an illustrative case of a meningioma located at the medial orbit and resected through an endoscopic endonasal approach that provided excellent visualization and anatomical exposure. Additionally, the authors review the concept and possible similarities between secondary and ectopic intraorbital meningiomas. LESSONS: An endoscopic endonasal approach should be considered as a feasible treatment option for intraorbital meningiomas, especially if they are in the medial orbital wall.

Indexed as

brain tumorendoscopic endonasal approachintraorbital meningioma

Identifiers

PMID36083773
PMCPMC9451051
OpenAlexW4294598303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.