Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36083634›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2022

Effects of nerve-sparing procedures on surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ching-Wei Yang, Hsiao-Hsien Wang, Mohamed Fayez Hassouna, Manish Chand, William J Huang, Hsiao-Jen Chung

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Minimally invasive surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023
    Article
  5. Risk-stratification system for preoperative evaluation.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A trend to minimize the radicality of surgery.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ching-Wei YangDepartment of Urology, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsiao-Hsien WangDepartment of Urology, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Mohamed Fayez HassounaWellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Manish ChandWellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, United Kingdom.
William J HuangShu-Tien Urological Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsiao-Jen ChungShu-Tien Urological Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
University College London · GBNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWCheng Hsin General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNerve-sparing (NS) techniques could potentially increase positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Nevertheless, the available studies have revealed ambiguous results among distinct groups. This study purposed to clarify the details of NS techniques to accurately estimate their influence on margin status.

methodsWe studied RARPs performed by one surgeon from 2010 to 2018. Surgical margins were evaluated by the laterality and levels of NS techniques in site-specific prostate lobes. The multivariable analysis evaluated the effects of nerve-sparing procedures, combined with other covariate factors, on margin status.

resultsOverall, 419 RARPs involving 838 prostate lobes were analyzed. Notably, 181 patients (43.4%) had pT2-stage, and 236 (56.6%) had pT3-stage cancer. The PSM rates for patients who underwent unilateral, bilateral, and non NS procedures were 30.3%, 28.8%, and 50%, respectively ( p = 0.233) or in stratification by pT2 ( p = 0.584) and pT3 ( p = 0.116) stage. The posterolateral PSM rates among site-specific prostate lobes were 10.9%, 22.4%, and 18.9% for complete, partial, and non NS techniques, respectively ( p = 0.001). The partial NS group revealed a significant increase in PSM rate compared with the complete NS (OR 2.187, 95% CI: 1.19-4.03) and non NS (OR 2.237, 95% CI: 1.01-4.93) groups in site-specific prostate lobes.

conclusionPartial NS procedures have a potential risk of increasing the positive surgical margins rate than complete and non NS procedures do. Therefore, correct case selection is required before performing partial NS techniques.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionProstateProstatectomy

Identifiers

PMID36083634
PMCPMC12755347
OpenAlexW4295048259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.